Most U.S. nuclear plants are profitable even if subsidies are removed.
How about dams?
Most U.S. nuclear plants are profitable even if subsidies are removed.
How about dams?
I donât know what that means but I will explain why I think your objectivity is comprised
You say Trump predicted the current events re. Ukraine
You say this because you give Trump credit that is not earned
He did not âpredictâ anything, but one of his staffers managed to get him to repeat a long standing us gvt policy
It went down like this
Staffer: hey, Mr President, if you say Germany should reduce itâs dependency on Russian oil
Trump: but that will upset my friend Vladimir. He thinks Iâm really cool, you know
Staffer: it will really piss off the Europeans, and the base will love it⊠Obama was very weak on Germanyâs dependence on Russian oil. Not like you Sir
Etc.
Your idolisation of Trump, like with any religious type adoration, enables you to see patterns that just arenât really there
Iâd love to see the evidence to support this position
Whatâs that got to do with political corruption?
The jury is still out on the former, but youâll need to prove the latter or STFU
I donât take your word on most things
If you want to persuade me, post supporting evidence
If you donât want to persuade me, donât bother responding to my posts
You are so hysterical regarding Trump, that it must seem to you, that anyone who is not similarly hysterical, âidolizesâ Trump.
When in fact, you are a nut, who makes shit up, and is rather stupid.
Also, you are a personal dead beat, who is supported by his baby momma, and the welfare system,
so of course you advocate welfare politics.
Trump wanted Europe and the UK to start paying their bills, and stop being dead beats, and of course this would bother you, because America has been subsidizing the welfare you get from your shit hole domicile.
For the rest of the room, the nuclear plants surrounding the D.C. area alone have budget surpluses of over $300 million currently, before any subsidies.
As usual, Doofa, is being stupid, and ignorant.
I have no desire to persuade you.
But I will bother to respond to some of your posts, as it pleases me,
to use you and your stupid posts as an educational device,
to inform others.
You know, donât be as dumb as Doofa, kind of thing.
I get the impression you are against subsidies? Are you?
I am not familiar with the economics of nuclear power. Iâm not opposed to it, though, as part of the process of curbing AGW.
Wind and solar have their own issues, though, not the least of which are environmental problems with their implementation. I am not opposed to either, though.
Why donât you look up nuke plant profitability and share it with us?
I donât get the impression he idolizes Trump.
Carl Schmitt, though, maybe.
In any case, your statement looks like you are making stuff up, or at least making some really big assumption(s).
You do that a lot, your realize that?
Everyoneâs objectivity is compromised, itâs called bias, and we all have it.
Including you, my brother in potato cultivation.
The trick is to be aware of your bias(es), so you can not let them hinder you from learning new things, being open to new ideas, and reason more effectively.
So, @doofaloofa, here we go. Iâve got a few minutes of extra time waiting on my second cup of coffee. The fresh taters and scrambled eggs with grated Romano cheese were delicious.
Oh look, the report that article cites says:
Imagine that !
I found that in 2 minutes of searching.
Bro you want to talk about objectivity and you literally just pulled this out of your ass.
Lol
Lmao even
Iâm pointing to a person saying a very specific thing would be an issue in the future, getting laughed at, and it turning out to come true. Again, youâre redditbrained.
What do you mean by âpolitical corruptionâ? The Greens pushing to denuclearize Germany and also push infeasible alternatives to fossil fuels having a bad outcome doesnât mean they were engaging in some kind of corruption. It just means they were stupid and wrong.
You literally just made some shit up. What do you call that other than lying?
Nah. I just think he was correct about the nature of politics and that frame is a useful one. Just like I think there were things about Trump that were and can be useful (Retire All Government Employees, how much he makes the people that want me dead and broke seethe, bringing manufacturing back to CONUS etc.) if he wins in 2024 but I donât really care about him as a person.
Maybe partially correct. Been reading up on him.
Itâs complex, though, admittedly. Itâs hard to get past him working for the NAZIs.
And Iâm not a fan of authoritarianism.
Again with the subjective interpretation of events
Again Trump was expressing us policy, and nobody laughed at him for that
Perhaps you are mixing it up with that time in Helsinki
Perhaps you could reciprocate with an example of German Green Party corruption?
Erm? Creative writing?
But you made the suggestion that I was fibbing before that, so like I said, prove it or shut up
I know
It makes you wonder why gonzo is so averse to providing evidence to support his unhinged theories, doesnât it
Take your pick:
It depends who you ask
A study in 2019 by the economic think tank DIW Berlin, found that nuclear power has not been profitable anywhere in the world.[22]
I would say the âprofitabilityâ of the US plants is not taking into account high construction/commissioning costs and high waste disposal/decommissioning costs at the end of the facilities working life
Chernobyl
âThe initial emergency response, together with later decontamination of the environment, involved more than 500,000 personnel and cost an estimated 18 billion Rbls âroughly US$68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation.â
âThe disaster has been estimated to cost some $235 billion in damages.â
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/chernobyl-disaster
What was the dollar value of the energy generated by Chenobyl?