I don’t get offended by things, I just disagree with them. It tends to be me doing the offending, when I advocate intelligence tests for voting and genocide to solve overpopulation, then eating the dead people to solve world hunger.
So you propose to kill the people who are to stupid to partake in the running of society and then eat them? The world needs more practical men like you.
I was thinking about killing the most redudant people first. With a suddenly smaller population, we wouldn’t need quite as much cheap labor, for example. We wouldn’t need as much of anything, really. So we could start by eliminating the least skilled at any given job.
I don’t like eating dumb food. That’s why I have to spend so much for my dinner, which consists only of pork brains and fresh, raw dolphin.
I just caught a dolphin that blew all his money on instant lottery tickets. How about it?
YAY FOR DICKSUCKING SOCIAL DARWINISM
I MEAN GOD IT’S NOT LIKE YOU HAVEN’T STUCK YOUR LIBERTARIAN MEAT HAMMERS INTO THE VERY PORES OF EVERY OTHER FORUM IN THE UNIVERSE
God, you’re an internet stereotype.
I don’t think it’s far to call me a Libertarian. In everything except voting rights and the problem of over-population, I’m very Left, albeit still Anarchistic.
Please don’t confuse being a moron with being a Libertarian 
Ravenink: No. I’m tired of these generic MONEY IS MONAWESOME douchebags trying to pass off late 1800s Laissez faire capitalism as an ideology that is “ethical”, “workable” or even “not totally fucking repulsive”.
psuedo-engrishy handle: Alright, listen: There is no “overpopulation problem”. There is a minority of the world’s citizens using the majority of the world’s resources. The USA, Japan and The UK use more of the world’s resources than the entire continent of Africa (Source: State of the world atlas).
Your Dogbert-wannabe antics are not only unsupportable in any kind of serious political debate, they’re as tired and unfunny as a thirty year old Henny Youngman sketch at a USO show.
Besides, your attempts to link voting rights to intelligence tests are unethical and ignore the obvious undertones of racism that would inevitably creep in. It’s also completely incompatible with ANY form of anarchism (I should know, I am an anarchist, unlike you).
Good thing I’m a Communist and whole-heartedly agree with you.
psuedo-engrishy handle: Alright, listen: There is no “overpopulation problem”. There is a minority of the world’s citizens using the majority of the world’s resources. The USA, Japan and The UK use more of the world’s resources than the entire continent of Africa (Source: State of the world atlas).
Your Dogbert-wannabe antics are not only unsupportable in any kind of serious political debate, they’re as tired and unfunny as a thirty year old Henny Youngman sketch at a USO show.
There’s definitely a problem with developed countries sucking up resources, but the solution to that would be to devolve society, which is completely retarded. If the entire world was as developed as the developed world, we’d have a larger shortage of everything. Is there any reason to hold the rest of the world back? No. Is there any reason to have redundant people? No.
Besides, your attempts to link voting rights to intelligence tests are unethical and ignore the obvious undertones of racism that would inevitably creep in. It’s also completely incompatible with ANY form of anarchism (I should know, I am an anarchist, unlike you).
I support intelligence tests for voting rights only when there’s voting, obviously. Aside from that, you’re forgetting that I’m a Communist. If there’s no difference between class because the classes don’t exist, obviously no one is getting cornholed by being left out of voting. It’s not my fault some people are too stupid to be allowed to vote.
You have no idea how much I appreciated this comment. Thank you for existing.
Even the smartest dolphins are at the risk of being fooled into purchasing lottery tickets by persuasive fortune tellers.
It was a reference to Futurama. The only acceptable answer would be, “Futurama sucks.”, if you don’t like Futurama, or one of the responses given by the characters.
Unless you mean “devolve” in the “early 80s synth-punk band who wore flower pots on their heads” sense of the word, the above makes no sense. The solution to a wealth disparity is redistribution of wealth, something you’d know if you were a socialist native to this planet and not one of the bizzaro socialists of Zarquon 12.
I support intelligence tests for voting rights only when there’s voting, obviously. Aside from that, you’re forgetting that I’m a Communist. If there’s no difference between class because the classes don’t exist, obviously no one is getting cornholed by being left out of voting. It’s not my fault some people are too stupid to be allowed to vote.
Which makes you basically…a psuedo-scientific, psuedo-darwinist, crypto-homo fascist. Nice job overlooking the last time literacy tests were applied to voting…you know, in the post civil war south.
Didn’t you read what I siad? Developing the entire world without any drop in population would just create a larger strain on the resources you’re pissed at the developed world for consuming.
Which makes you basically…a psuedo-scientific, psuedo-darwinist, crypto-homo fascist. Nice job overlooking the last time literacy tests were applied to voting…you know, in the post civil war south.
Not only is post-Civil War South completely different from the society I enivisoned, but I’m not too enthralled with Democracy either, except when all participants are intelligent, meaning that, my ideal society wouldn’t have voting to begind with. Good job.
Holy shit you are serious.
Not entirely. He’s right, it is pretty unCommunist of me to support genocide, but there’s no question that there’s too many people.
And here I thought communism and anarchism were exclusive to annoying european teenagers. I could definitly see why someone would be like for an ideology outside of conventional politics in america though.
You might have had a point if I didn’t become a Communist because all the other systems blow, and instead became a Communist to be different.
Communism looks good on paper, however, it has yet to be successful in any large societies. I think it’s because communism underestimates the motivational power of greed.