I can only do one next term, it’s either TaeKwonDo/kickboxing or Boxing.
Which do you guys think I have more potential in, and should stick at?
Kicking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMQ5lzK6YAM
Boxing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6NLaj9989E
more Boxing: https://www.youtube.com/edit?o=U&video_id=UEf5aLxhG04
No judo?
[QUOTE=hungryjoe;2983519]No judo?[/QUOTE]
Why did I ask here…
Adv. Striking --------> YMAS
Wrong forum for other people picking your art for you.
Feel free to post technical discussions from your chosen class in Adv. Striking.
[QUOTE=BackFistMonkey;2983521]Adv. Striking --------> YMAS
Wrong forum for other people picking your art for you.
Feel free to post technical discussions from your chosen class in Adv. Striking.[/QUOTE]
I have already done both. I was asking on a technical basis.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983520]Why did I ask here…[/QUOTE]
Because you crave attention.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983516]I can only do one next term, it’s either TaeKwonDo/kickboxing or Boxing.
Which do you guys think I have more potential in, and should stick at?[/QUOTE]
The one you enjoy more.
[QUOTE=DCS;2983524]The one you enjoy more.[/QUOTE]
Equal.
The one with the better technical coaching, i.e. the trainer which is both able and willing to see and correct technique (both drills and sparring) on an individual basis more often - if all other things (aliveness, training time, fun, etc.) are equal.
From a 5 second video? You may as well have posted nothing at all.
But lets figure a strategy…
If you only studied things you were “good” in you’d never study anything. Theres nothing instinctual about efficient fighting. It matters less what you think you’re good at and more at what you WANT to be good at. Study the style in which you want to improve. If you want critique, 5 second videos aren’t going to accomplish anything, as boxing is much more than just making a fist and throwing it. There is also so much more to take into account in regards to where/what you should train as not all gyms or instructors are created equal. Not all of them cost the same either, or have the same class schedule, etc.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983525]Equal.[/QUOTE]
Taekwondo and kickboxing are not synonymous. You did the old backslash between them as if they were. Muay Thai and kickboxing are synonymous. Knockdown karate and kickboxing are synonymous. K1 or Dutch kickboxing is synonymous with kickboxing. Good Sanda is synonymous with kickboxing. Taekwondo is synonymous with kickpunchery tag while wearing floaties.
I think boxing or Muay thai is the quickest way to learn to strike. Theres very little fluff in either.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983525]Equal.[/QUOTE]
Why are you such a fag? Have you once asked an intelligent question since you got to these forums? (The answer is no you dumbfuck).
[QUOTE=Raycetpfl;2983532]Taekwondo and kickboxing are not synonymous. You did the old backslash between them as if they were. Muay Thai and kickboxing are synonymous. Knockdown karate and kickboxing are synonymous. K1 or Dutch kickboxing is synonymous with kickboxing. Good Sanda is synonymous with kickboxing. Taekwondo is synonymous with kickpunchery tag while wearing floaties.
I think boxing or Muay thai is the quickest way to learn to strike. Theres very little fluff in either.[/QUOTE]Dude take a look at his previous posts before getting into this.
[QUOTE=Raycetpfl;2983532]Taekwondo and kickboxing are not synonymous. You did the old backslash between them as if they were. Muay Thai and kickboxing are synonymous. Knockdown karate and kickboxing are synonymous. K1 or Dutch kickboxing is synonymous with kickboxing. Good Sanda is synonymous with kickboxing. Taekwondo is synonymous with kickpunchery tag while wearing floaties.
I think boxing or Muay thai is the quickest way to learn to strike. Theres very little fluff in either.[/QUOTE]
Iol. I replied to which one I enjoy the most
Put it this way, if I was ever in a fight, I hope the person I am fighting has your skill level.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983520]Why did I ask here…[/QUOTE]
my thoughts exactly
Ok a few questions
Why just ONE of each move? only one punch and one kick is not going to help
Jeans for kicking? Really mr van damme wannabe?
[QUOTE=kimjonghng;2983584]Ok a few questions
Why just ONE of each move? only one punch and one kick is not going to help
Jeans for kicking? Really mr van damme wannabe?[/QUOTE]
Because you don’t need to see more if you know the subject. There are also different types of boxers. Mayweather threw one punch at a time, while Canelo is a combo guy. There is no requirement to be a great combinational puncher to succeed in boxing. You don’t even need a good foundation. Just look at Deontay Wilder
[QUOTE=battlefields;2983564]Put it this way, if I was ever in a fight, I hope the person I am fighting has your skill level.[/QUOTE]
Haha. But not me? You know I piss my pants whenever I’m out at night. I’m really scared. Scared to get beat up.
[QUOTE=Heuristic;2983591]Because you don’t need to see more if you know the subject. There are also different types of boxers. Mayweather threw one punch at a time, while Canelo is a combo guy. There is no requirement to be a great combinational puncher to succeed in boxing. You don’t even need a good foundation. Just look at Deontay Wilder[/QUOTE]
You only demonstrate one punch and one kick and want a technical breakdown of your style when he have no idea what your other punches and kicks are like. You think mayweather only has one punch in his punching repetoire? Or there are any boxers who can only jab?
GTFO scrublord