If you are going to pick a stereotype to tread the path of power. You should probably commit to it though.
Then sacrificing your moral compas to gain power was a waste of time.
I donāt think you actually understand US domestic politics tbqh if you think what I have written here when I wasnāt shitposting is Free Marketā¢ Conservatism.
So in your āpick the system that gives you an easier lifeā system you are arguing that you are in power?
I am not discussing politics. I am discussing ideology. Which is .uch more interesting.
Ideology doesnāt really matter, to be frank. But if you want to discuss ideology, Iām not a Free Marketā¢ Conservative inc. type and never have been. They are worse than the people who see me as an enemy because they are just the outer party.
The thing is you are not really creating a free society. That would involve a society that can incorporate other beliefs.
And you are specifically against that as a method to create this winning system. Where they are wrong. You are right and there is no room for difference of opinion.(pretty much which is where the whole moral bankruptcy idea comes in to play)
So it doesnāt matter which system you use. You are not doing anything good for anyone. And you are not creating freedom. All that matters is which system you can benefit more from.
What do you mean by āfreeā in this instance? Do you think those of us who live in the US today live in a āfreeā society?
Well that wonāt work. It sullies the waters if you start incorporating left leaning ideology like enforcing baby formula for children. Next thing you know you will be enjoying a Buz Lightyear movie.
1 Like
Its a scale. Being able to determine your own ideology rather than having to choose one should theoretically be more free.
I think youāre getting too caught up on categorizing the politics of real people into a neat package of social and policy preferences delineated from other distinct packages of social and policy preferences. Real people and real life donāt work like that.
I donāt care if, for example, the market isnāt āfreeā under my ideal system. We donāt even live in a free market right now anyway. So if a corporation is doing something that harms the well being of the nation they should be stopped and/or punished for doing so. Iām not big on āfree tradeā either. Not because I donāt understand it but because I do understand it and I donāt care solely about GDP growth and trade specialization.
At the same time I donāt care for the LGBT coalition grooming children either. And Iām not a supporter of the Catholic church so if clergy get caught grooming children they go to the gulag too.
If youāre interested in learning how this works in other contexts, look into Catholic Liberation Theology in Latin America in the 20th century. Multiple explicitly Marxist and Maoist revolutionary movements followed a Liberation Theology thought and were also explicitly Catholic. Or look into the Strasserites within the NSDAP.
You can determine your own ideology regardless of where and when you live. That doesnāt mean you will have power but the inside of your head is free.
Youāre a fascist, we get it.
Are trying to be coy about it?
Iām an antifascist. If you disagree with me you are definitionally a fascist.
Lol
You are literally describing facism.
Ie. Everything is acceptable as long as it is in the best interest of the state. As determined by your Authority of course.
Iām sure you would gladly take a handy from the Vatican if it helped you secure your political aims and maintain power.
I didnāt write āstateā.
Do you know what idea the word āstateā is referring to?
The human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory? Nation and State are not synonymous.
They are when youāre a fascist.
Itās a good thing Iām an antifascist then. You should probably stop disagreeing with me, someone might think youāre a fascist.