WORK IN PROGRESS
Luke Holloway came to Bullshido’s attention in May of 2006. He was originally the head of a martial arts school called Zhen Dao Wushu, which sold itself as a CMA school in Australia.
This article is drawn directly from the material which was presented [here - thread link] the thread was originally started by forum member Bodhi108 on the 27 Oct 2010.
Holloway then specifically claimed of law enforcement & military training & advertising himself on a social networking site [link] as an operative. He apparently expanded his operations into the USA, specifically Maryland.
Luke Holloway bio
I. Martial Arts Experience
Holloway claims to have received Dan ranking or instructor certification in the following arts:
*Kung Fu (No mention of a particular style or styles)
*Taiji
*Freestyle/MMA
*Silat (Holloway claims “a number of systems”, but again, no particulars are named)
*FMA (no specific systems named, other than Kali/Escrima/Arnis)
*Jujutsu
*Taekwondo
Holloway’s bio makes no mention of any particular instructors, rankings, or certifications that he has actually received, only empty, blanket claims. The only instructor listed in his bio is Grand Master Siow of Malaysia, who Holloway states is his Lion Dance teacher.
II. Security & Law Enforcement Experience
Holloway claims to have been involved in security industry & law enforcement for, at the time of writing, aproximately 10 years but does not make any specific claims to have served or trained with any specific law enforcement agency at any time. He claims to have had “hands on” law enforcement experience in the following countries:
*Australia
*Malaysia
*China
*Hong Kong
*Thailand
*Taiwan
*Japan
III. Security & Law Enforcement Certification
He claims to hold qualifications & certifications in the United States & Australia which would be recognized by the international law enforcement & security community, but he does not provide those certifications. He claims the following:
*NRA membership
*Government qualified in coaching (NCAS)
*Government qualified in training & assessement
*Government qualified security & protective operative
*Government qualified in risk management, assessment, & consultations (security)
Holloway claimed to be “STILL an active operative”, but makes no mention of who he is an “operative” for.
Following the creation of the thread, an interview with Holloway was presented in the thread : http://combativecorner.wordpress.com/2010/11/25/10-questions-with-luke-holloway/
Entitled “10 questions about Luke Holloway” the article confirmed a number of the claims Holloway had been making both online through his Youtube account [link] and through the Social Networking site Facebook [link] The article has been copied and can be read without any editing here [link]
On the 6th Dec 2010 a newly registered forum member “Mimo” entered the thread discussion with his/her first post [link] the post from “mimo” appeard a little defensive and slightly antagonistic in nature. Forum member “Rock Ape” clarified…
"Luke Holloway claims to be teaching Military and Special Forces.
Given that Holloway has never served in either capacity makes it HIGHLY UNLIKELY if not ENTIRELY IMPOSSIBLE for someone of Holloway’s age and or experience to be employed in that role.
You talk about certified and qualified - don’t bullshit me by trying to equate the position of the Presidency of the United States against someone attempting to pad their resume.
The way you try to compare being qualified/certified but miss the all important bit being actually EXPERIENCED.
How much military EXPERIENCE has Holloway to justify his claim of teaching those professionals? How much Special Forces EXPERIENCE has Holloway to justify his claim of teaching those professionals.
I’m military with a career going back to 1983, and Holloway’s weapon skills (firearms) are appalling from what he’s presenting on the internet.
Given that Holloway lives in Japan, has Japanese students and you are yourself posting from Japan. That your first post just happens to be in this thread, forgive me for being just a little bit cautious about your motives for posting."
Mimo continued to post, each occasion it appeard to be supporting, perhaps not directly Holloway’s position and attempting to debunk the thread’s purpose.
More to follow