JPRMT - Keep Getting Hit Up By This Dude To Remove Posts

Hey y’all, member named JPRMT keeps asking me over message to delete posts on some thread and won’t put it in the Support Forum.

Hello Sir/Ma’am

I am the John Perone referred to in this link

https://www.bullshido.net/forums/sho…=17861&page=19

post 183.

I am hoping you would kindly remove the post. There was an issue between Scott Sonnon and myself in 2002 around money not returned and unfortunately it spilled onto usenet. A variety of sock puppets were created by his cadre of followers to discredit me and attack my person. This one here is still ranking first page on google when someone searches my name and Kinesiologist. It’s defamatory in nature and was only ever done to taint my name. I am kindly asking, since it’s not relevant in any way and is damaging to my reputation, as well as all false, if someone from your team can please remove it, and please remove any reference of my name on your site, as I’ve never been a contributing member and again, it is ranking page 1 on google for John Perone Kinesiologist please.

If you would like to confirm my identity, I work Tuesdays and Thursdays here:

https://www.portcoquitlamphysio.com/our-team
(604) 945-6644

or personal 778-706-1367 and I will confirm that I am indeed the person in question in the postings made by, likely, sock puppets referencing my name negatively.

Thank you kindly,
John Perone

He kept asking for the “owner of the site” and I said that it would be best to put the request in the Support Forum so the appropriate person could get back to him. He’s starting to piss me off, acting like he knows about SEO to a digital marketing expert.

I don’t know what the protocol is here, but I was pretty firm with him telling him I couldn’t help.

Yeah, I’ve swapped a few messages with him, basically telling him how to deal with it: request the original poster redact, or refute the assertion in the thread. Raised to Phrost and the rest of the advisory board, as well, just so everyone’s aware.

I won’t get all lawyery - others that do that for a living can - but basically our position is that posters are responsible for their content. We only take down stuff that is imminently threatening (e.g. PII), blatant abuse of service (spam), causes immediate harm to the site or its continued operation, or as required by force of law.

For posterity:

Obviously, we’re at an impasse. We are trying to stick to a legal definition of how we operate. Of course, I’m always reticent to tell somebody to “sue us,” so I avoided that language as much as possible.

Damn, as if on cue: