Kungfoolss, why do you use the term “colored folk” like you’re the bad guy in a civil rights drama?
Humans rule. Dolphins can suck it.
I have been wondering that myself.
KFss has his ways of manipulating the debate flow. It’s just his tactic to provoke anger and cause emotional response from the more sentitive and politically-correct members on this forum so that his substance-empty insults will sound intellectual and thus making him look like the one in control of the situation - a childish tactic that he likes to use so often.
But then again, for all I know, with the kind of red-neck logic and mentality he has been displaying, he could really be a bigot. That wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
Judging by the defensive trolling, Id say that Kungfoolss hasnt killed anyone and can only do so in theory.
Osiris’ about to make you his bitch. August 30th, 2003
Kungfoolss–You’re an idiot. Most egyptians were black. How many white folks have you seen running around the hot ass desert? Oh yea…did you know that Egypt is IN AFRICA???
In any case, when Alexander The Great marched into Egypt…he had his army blow off the nose of the Sphinx…why? Because the Sphinx’s nose had a wide, flat shape like an African.
(Laughs) Ahh, stylists. What would I ever do without you dolts? <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>
Who said anything about stylists here, Kungfoolss?
“You can’t cast aspersions on someone because they’re wearing a cape. Superman wore a cape, and I’ll be damned if I’ll let you say something bad about him.” - Jerry Seinfeld
Kungfoolss, why do you use the term “colored folk” like you’re the bad guy in a civil rights drama?
Ahhh, the ignorance of the stylists rears its ugly head once again. (Sighs)
Tell me, how exactly does the use of the word ‘colored’ make me a bad man? It denotes no connotation of racial intolerance or insensitivity, only your warped perception and emotional ties to the issue accomplishes that.
“I recognize the Republican party as the sheet anchor of the colored man’s political hopes and the ark of his safety.” Frederick Douglass 1888
I said “Not Grappling” as grappling can be trained at full power. When a submission is applied the opponent can tap out at any time and be released. The only difference is if the situation was “real” you would not release the hold, and either break the limb, or KO the opponent with a choke/strangle. IMO, this is by far the best method of training, as you never hold back and there are usually no injuries.
There is no “tapping out” of a leathal SCARS move, as they are designed to kill. How can they be tested without great injury or death ?
Eyes open wide, looking at the heavens with a tear in my eye.
Yes there’s love if you want it, don’t sound like a sonnet.
so black is a colour now?
i think i should go out and kill some people as well…
–
Hard work, Patience, Dedication.
I said “Not Grappling” as grappling can be trained at full power.
I believe the operative words there are “can be,” but obviously control must be at the forefront of any action taken, compression application or otherwise.
When a submission is applied the opponent can tap out at any time and be released.
As can a leverage break, or lethal movement. Not everything you need to know is found in the sporting world, I believe that is part of your confusion.
There is no “tapping out” of a leathal SCARS move, as they are designed to kill.
…and how exactly did you come by this faulty line of reasoning?