1 week in Class Sifu Defender (but not really defending)

[QUOTE=It is Fake;2761464]I know what you WRITE, I have not claimed to know anything about YOU.

Damn, you are one of the angriest passive aggressive poster we’ve seen in a few years.[/QUOTE]

LOL…I have no anger, my friend, but you do intrigue me.

-Matterz

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761477]LOL…I have no anger, my friend, but you do intrigue me.

-Matterz[/QUOTE]You have plenty, it is written all over this thread.

[QUOTE=It is Fake;2761484]You have plenty, it is written all over this thread.[/QUOTE]

You are speculating by adding inflection where none exists. Perhaps it is you with the anger and you are projecting it onto me? Your posts are much angrier in content than mine ever are…saying I should STFU because I’m a NOOB and don’t know how to defend my teacher…tsk tsk…sounds pretty angry to me. LOL. As I said you intrigue me. :wink:

-Matterz

[QUOTE=battlefields;2761537]I have begun sending emails to appropriate people in order to confirm certain informations. Hopefully I get a reply soon. Forgot to copy the email, though, like an idiot.[/QUOTE]

Excellent Battlefield, thank you.

-Matterz

ps: you can maybe find a copy in your sent folder.

The name is battlefields, lower case b and an s on the end. Don’t presume I am computer illiterate either, they do not show up in my sent folder because they weren’t sent through my email.

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761539]You are speculating by adding inflection where none exists. Perhaps it is you with the anger and you are projecting it onto me? Your posts are much angrier in content than mine ever are…saying I should STFU because I’m a NOOB and don’t know how to defend my teacher…tsk tsk…sounds pretty angry to me. LOL. As I said you intrigue me. :wink:

-Matterz[/QUOTE]No projection, just you failing pitifully at semantic based word games.

Making demands:
[QUOTE=Matterz;2761095]. Do yourself a favor and humble yourself to a Sifu who has over 40 years training in Wing Tchun under his belt.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761098] Open your eyes, and learn something. Humble yourself and apologize, you have crossed so many lines that simple respect and true inquiry into truth would have never done this. I ask you now, are you a true “student” of Martial Arts or an Internet bully trying to dampen someone else’s fire? Peace.
[/QUOTE]

Anger!

Calling someone stupid[QUOTE=Matterz;2761098]Obviously you are not a person of wisdom.
-Matterz[/QUOTE]

Anger!

Accusing someone of using pseudonyms:
[QUOTE=Matterz;2761119] Also, how many pseudo names did you use to comment the same thing? I read a lot of the posts in YouTube and it wasn’t cool at all. Now you are a little wiser…if you apply these lessons to your future. ;)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761182]You used multiple or at least two different accounts to forcibly try to provoke, humiliate, threaten, and defame publicly Sifu Fernandez for this info.
-Matterz[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761124]Come on. Coincidentally “someone” else was mouthing and saying the exact same things as you and your friend? Is that what you’re telling me and the others reading this post? [/QUOTE]

Anger and Irony!
I could almost believe this ridiculousness, if you had at least a year of experience with your teacher; you have a week.

Lol. Told.

[QUOTE=battlefields;2761541]The name is battlefields, lower case b and an s on the end. Don’t presume I am computer illiterate either, they do not show up in my sent folder because they weren’t sent through my email.[/QUOTE]

And this, Matterz, is why you are getting such a hard time (that and your bullheadedness). You want to talk about respect? You’ve now gotten 2 people’s names wrong when they are WRITTEN RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. Where’s the respect in that? Two possible reasons:

  1. You’re not being respectful at all, and are full of shit. Is the impression you want to give? Remember, your instructor has now been contacted. How will you look?

  2. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?

For your sake, I hope its 2). I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you called me trav and explained that your system truncated it (Indicating you didn’t check your post before you sent it, highlighting your lack of attention to detail).
Interestingly, if your spellcheck system highlights trav as a word, I have to wonder what kind of you stuff look up on your computer. There are two meanings for trav (which is why you shouldn’t call anyone that unless invited to):

  1. daft cunt
  2. sexual maniac

Which one did you mean to call me?

[QUOTE=battlefields;2761541]The name is battlefields, lower case b and an s on the end. Don’t presume I am computer illiterate either, they do not show up in my sent folder because they weren’t sent through my email.[/QUOTE]

And this, Matterz, is why you are getting such a hard time (that and your bullheadedness). You want to talk about respect? You’ve now gotten 2 people’s names wrong when they are WRITTEN RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. Where’s the respect in that? Two possible reasons:

  1. You’re not being respectful at all, and are full of shit. Is the impression you want to give? Remember, your instructor has now been contacted. How will you look?

  2. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?

For your sake, I hope its 2). I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you called me trav and explained that your system truncated it (Indicating you didn’t check your post before you sent it, highlighting your lack of attention to detail).
Interestingly, if your spellcheck system highlights trav as a word, I have to wonder what kind of you stuff look up on your computer. There are two meanings for trav (which is why you shouldn’t call anyone that unless invited to):

  1. daft cunt
  2. sexual maniac

Which one did you mean to call me?

edit: Double post.

[QUOTE=battlefields;2761541]The name is battlefields, lower case b and an s on the end. Don’t presume I am computer illiterate either, they do not show up in my sent folder because they weren’t sent through my email.[/QUOTE]

battlefields, I uppercase names as a show of respect, my apologies to my lack of detail when “thanking you”. And I presume nothing, I was offering a helpful suggestion. Have a good day.

-Matterz

[QUOTE=traversnz;2761548]And this, Matterz, is why you are getting such a hard time (that and your bullheadedness). You want to talk about respect? You’ve now gotten 2 people’s names wrong when they are WRITTEN RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. Where’s the respect in that? Two possible reasons:

  1. You’re not being respectful at all, and are full of shit. Is the impression you want to give? Remember, your instructor has now been contacted. How will you look?

  2. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?

For your sake, I hope its 2). I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you called me trav and explained that your system truncated it (Indicating you didn’t check your post before you sent it, highlighting your lack of attention to detail).
Interestingly, if your spellcheck system highlights trav as a word, I have to wonder what kind of you stuff look up on your computer. There are two meanings for trav (which is why you shouldn’t call anyone that unless invited to):

  1. daft cunt
  2. sexual maniac

Which one did you mean to call me?[/QUOTE]

My typos are completely innocent I can assure you. I do not call people names such as you describe, so my answer is 3…none of the above. Sorry for my lack of attention to detail, I am fallible.

-Matterz

[QUOTE=traversnz;2761548]And this, Matterz, is why you are getting such a hard time (that and your bullheadedness). You want to talk about respect? You’ve now gotten 2 people’s names wrong when they are WRITTEN RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU. Where’s the respect in that? Two possible reasons:

  1. You’re not being respectful at all, and are full of shit. Is the impression you want to give? Remember, your instructor has now been contacted. How will you look?

  2. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?

For your sake, I hope its 2). I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you called me trav and explained that your system truncated it (Indicating you didn’t check your post before you sent it, highlighting your lack of attention to detail).
Interestingly, if your spellcheck system highlights trav as a word, I have to wonder what kind of you stuff look up on your computer. There are two meanings for trav (which is why you shouldn’t call anyone that unless invited to):

  1. daft cunt
  2. sexual maniac

Which one did you mean to call me?[/QUOTE]

My typos are completely innocent I can assure you. I do not call people names such as you describe, so my answer is 3…none of the above. Sorry for my lack of attention to detail, I am fallible.

-Matterz

[QUOTE=It is Fake;2761545]No projection, just you failing pitifully at semantic based word games.

Making demands:

Anger!

Calling someone stupid

Anger!

Accusing someone of using pseudonyms:

Anger and Irony!
I could almost believe this ridiculousness, if you had at least a year of experience with your teacher; you have a week.[/QUOTE]

It is Fake, trying to explain that there is no inflection in my words that they are just being put out there for all to read and to help clarify something is not semantics. And in that I did not fail, perhaps you only fail to understand?

Those were not demands, did I say “you better humble yourself” or" if you don’t humble yourself I’m going to…"? No I didn’t I “suggested” a course of action that might help still the waters. I was trying to be diplomatic and reasonable to an “admitted” error in judgement and tact by SprawlnBrawl. Nothing more and nothing less. Again you read into something that is simply not there, your issue.

Furthermore, saying someone is not wise does not denote level of intelligence. Wisdom comes with maturity and experience. I was merely pointing out that a wise approach of humility more likely will garner a more positive response. Nothing more and nothing less. Don’t read into my words with anger where none exists.

Also, I did not accuse him of using pseudonyms, SprawlnBrawl said this himself in his post copying the email. He used his friends account…that is using a pseudonym. And I commented that it is not far fetched to “speculate” that he may in fact be responsible for using others as well…as Sifu Fernandez also “speculated”. It was a logical point based on SprawlnBrawl’s own posts.

Finally, I am not “fighting” for my Sifu. As I said many times. I didn’t like SprawlnBrawl’s approach to his questioning Sifu and knew something of Sifu that I thought I could share from my own investigation/inquiry/call. People asked me questions and I answered as best I could. SprawlnBrawl asked me questions and I answered him as best I could, all to lead to this? My points remain, my status remains. I am not Sifu Fernandez’s protector, he doesn’t need me, I am just a humble student of MA who saw an act of disrespect and tried to bring some information that might calm the situation.

Peace.

-Matterz

Typos are never innocent.

Welcome to Bullshido.

Lurk more, post less.

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761593]It is Fake, trying to explain that there is no inflection in my words that they are just being put out there for all to read and to help clarify something is not semantics. And in that I did not fail, perhaps you only fail to understand?

Those were not demands, did I say “you better humble yourself” or" if you don’t humble yourself I’m going to…"? No I didn’t I “suggested” a course of action that might help still the waters. I was trying to be diplomatic and reasonable to an “admitted” error in judgement and tact by SprawlnBrawl. Nothing more and nothing less. Again you read into something that is simply not there, your issue.

Furthermore, saying someone is not wise does not denote level of intelligence. Wisdom comes with maturity and experience. I was merely pointing out that a wise approach of humility more likely will garner a more positive response. Nothing more and nothing less. Don’t read into my words with anger where none exists.

Also, I did not accuse him of using pseudonyms, SprawlnBrawl said this himself in his post copying the email. He used his friends account…that is using a pseudonym. And I commented that it is not far fetched to “speculate” that he may in fact be responsible for using others as well…as Sifu Fernandez also “speculated”. It was a logical point based on SprawlnBrawl’s own posts.

Finally, I am not “fighting” for my Sifu. As I said many times. I didn’t like SprawlnBrawl’s approach to his questioning Sifu and knew something of Sifu that I thought I could share from my own investigation/inquiry/call. People asked me questions and I answered as best I could. SprawlnBrawl asked me questions and I answered him as best I could, all to lead to this? My points remain, my status remains. I am not Sifu Fernandez’s protector, he doesn’t need me, I am just a humble student of MA who saw an act of disrespect and tried to bring some information that might calm the situation.

Peace.

-Matterz[/QUOTE]Your quotes are there no matter how hard you try to “suggest” something different. You are rude, arrogant angry and passive aggressive, you just use weasel words to play semantic based word games. Oh and don’t lie, I never addressed inflection, I discussed semantics.

No, you are not humble or respectful.

So, that is you failing to read my post.

Oops, I forgot you want to play semantics:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wisdom

Wisdom:
Near Antonyms: density, dullness (also dulness), obtuseness; brainlessness, folly, foolishness, idiocy, imbecility, mindlessness, silliness, simplemindedness, simpleness, stupidity, witlessness; illogic, irrationality, unreasonableness, unsoundness; craziness, insanity, lunacy, madness; preposterousness, senselessness, silliness, zaniness

Context:
[QUOTE=Matterz;2761098]Obviously you are not a person of wisdom. If I may offer you this, never take someones word for anything! If you don’t see it, experience it, or have it yourself…then don’t form an opinion or approach someone as if you “know” what you don’t. Open your eyes, and learn something. Humble yourself and apologize, you have crossed so many lines that simple respect and true inquiry into truth would have never done this. I ask you now, are you a true “student” of Martial Arts or an Internet bully trying to dampen someone else’s fire? Peace.[/quote]Hmm there you are demanding an apology, telling him he is either a “bully” or a “true student of martial arts,” you tell him how to form an opinion, and then tell him he has “something to learn.”

So, you say he “lacks wisdom” and has something to learn but that isn’t talking about his intelligence?

Hahahaha, Yes, that is you talking about his low level of intelligence using weasel words.

Your anger is causing you to read poorly.

[QUOTE=Matterz;2761588]My typos are completely innocent I can assure you. I do not call people names such as you describe, so my answer is 3…none of the above. Sorry for my lack of attention to detail, I am fallible.

-Matterz[/QUOTE]

No, it means 2. The variables were already MECE.

  1. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?

Oh hey! That wing tchun do website offers a free online course!

Consider me signed up

[QUOTE=traversnz;2761618]No, it means 2. The variables were already MECE.

  1. You lack attention to detail - if that’s the case, then we have every right to question your due diligence. Fair enough?[/QUOTE]

LOL…fair enough.

[QUOTE=It is Fake;2761610]Your quotes are there no matter how hard you try to “suggest” something different. You are rude, arrogant angry and passive aggressive, you just use weasel words to play semantic based word games. Oh and don’t lie, I never addressed inflection, I discussed semantics.

No, you are not humble or respectful.

So, that is you failing to read my post.

Oops, I forgot you want to play semantics:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wisdom

Wisdom:
Near Antonyms: density, dullness (also dulness), obtuseness; brainlessness, folly, foolishness, idiocy, imbecility, mindlessness, silliness, simplemindedness, simpleness, stupidity, witlessness; illogic, irrationality, unreasonableness, unsoundness; craziness, insanity, lunacy, madness; preposterousness, senselessness, silliness, zaniness

Context:
Hmm there you are demanding an apology, telling him he is either a “bully” or a “true student of martial arts,” you tell him how to form an opinion, and then tell him he has “something to learn.”

So, you say he “lacks wisdom” and has something to learn but that isn’t talking about his intelligence?

Hahahaha, Yes, that is you talking about his low level of intelligence using weasel words.

Your anger is causing you to read poorly.[/QUOTE]

Now now lets not get too upset over this. LOL…you call it semantics, whatever, your prerogative. I’m sorry I upset you so much with my passive aggressive words. I guess I accomplished more than I ever hoped for in all this. Good luck in your future, I wish you well. Oh and thank you for the English lesson, that was truly inspirational.

-Matterz