OK. Here is where I am coming from: I am angry about the injustice of SC’s posts. On her own admission she is blinded by prejudice, has not even had the decency to read the main source material (the Book) before making her claims and suppositions into statements of fact, and she therefore has no credibility whatsoever.
She is now stooping to new lows by posting links to articles about convicted Christian paedophiles - with the object of achieving what else, other than the creation of an association in people’s minds between Tony Anthony and paedophilia.
That is outrageous.
My advice to her is to devote herself to her chicken delivery service, and to desist from pretending to be some sort of clever private investigator. She shows no concern whatsoever for the people she is hurting - namely the wife and family of TA and his close associates.
Terraform and Filehelp seem to be doing good work, and I would encourage them to continue in it wholeheartedly. I would though respectfully caution Filehelp to refrain from making “statements of fact” that are still unproven.
Overseas, I would urge you, if you have not done so already, to at least read the Book, before continuing your campaign against TA and Avanti as a result of your own instincts.
Do not look to this thread to provide you with accurate information about TA. It is chock full of exaggeration and distortion.
Let me for the record tell you where I am coming from. I am only interested in establishing the truth.
I need to be absolutely certain that he is a fraud before I take further action.
There are matters that can be proved beyond doubt, quite easily, as I have shown in previous posts.
But I suspect that there is a reluctance to do so because prejudiced posters on this forum fear that if these matters were proven, and the outcome was not favourable to their position, it would weaken their case against TA.
That is dishonest.
To date there has not been one shred of proveable evidence against him produced on this forum.
The arguments used against him here are full of prejudice, bias, personal opinion and the such like. For the most part this thread is nothing other than a Mediaeval witch-hunt.
I will deal with the issue of whether or not TA is in law a “serial killer” and “murderer”, as SC repeatedly asserts, in a later post.
I will continue to challenge prejudiced, unproven and slanderous nonsense whenever it appears in this thread.