[QUOTE=Dr. Gonzo;3013586]Here I thought I was doing something nice for you, as you asked me to give some feedback on Trump’s prior real estate projects.[/QUOTE]
You need to learn the difference between feedback and noise.
Your response was almost 350 words. Some of your responses can be seen from space.
Monkey’s point would be valid no matter what you wrote. He asked if you read what you write. I really don’t think so, given the poor formatting of the response, which totally lost the reader.
[QUOTE=hungryjoe;3013614]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/01/20/us/nathan-phillips-covington.amp.html
Good the NYT at least put in a little effort to get this story straight. MSM in general? Not so much. Cause goes against their narrative, nay, bias.[/QUOTE]
Who is the not MSM media we should be listening to? I mean the ones without the bias that told everything correctly the first time.
FOX is probably the most guilty news organization on Earth when it comes to reporting Twitter trends as “many people are saying…”. As the anti-MSM, FOX should be getting their stories accurate 100% of the time on day zero.
QAnon exists because of bias against what they perceive is the “MSM”, “Deep State”, etc. These aren’t real things, they are politically loaded bullshit terms.
When did you start using the term “MSM” and why? My guess is a specific news source is the answer.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013615]You need to learn the difference between feedback and noise.
Your response was almost 350 words. Some of your responses can be seen from space.
Monkey’s point would be valid no matter what you wrote. He asked if you read what you write. I really don’t think so, given the poor formatting of the response, which totally lost the reader.[/QUOTE]
No, you’re wrong. Bill is right.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013615]You need to learn the difference between feedback and noise.
Your response was almost 350 words. Some of your responses can be seen from space.
Monkey’s point would be valid no matter what you wrote. He asked if you read what you write. I really don’t think so, given the poor formatting of the response, which totally lost the reader.[/QUOTE]
No, Monkey asked if I think about what I write, not if I read what I write.
[QUOTE=BackFistMonkey;3013583]lol do you even think about the shit you write sometimes?[/QUOTE]
The fact that my post writing style annoys you is a plus, in my book.
I’ll accept the casualty of losing readers, if there is the added bonus that it causes you an annoyance.
Because you amuse others on the site with your ridiculousness when you get annoyed.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013617]Who is the not MSM media we should be listening to? I mean the ones without the bias that told everything correctly the first time.
FOX is probably the most guilty news organization on Earth when it comes to reporting Twitter trends as “many people are saying…”.
QAnon exists because of bias against what they perceive is the “MSM”.[/QUOTE]
Don’t be lazy and/or obtuse.
I linked an article from the NYTs. Occasionally they actually try to tell it like it is. Was in this situation.
[QUOTE=Dr. Gonzo;3013616]He is a real JFK and Bill Clinton, isn’t he.[/QUOTE]
John F Kennedy and Clinton never sold the United States out to Russian thugs.
Melania probably has more dirt on Donald than anyone. An untouchable Russian snowflake who filled the White House with red Christmas trees.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013622]John F Kennedy and Clinton never sold the United States out to Russian thugs.
Melania probably has more dirt on Donald than anyone. An untouchable Russian snowflake who filled the White House with red Christmas trees.[/QUOTE]
Evidence please. This is your treasured yardstick, claimed anyway. Cause Bullshido.
[QUOTE=hungryjoe;3013621]Don’t be lazy and/or obtuse.
I linked an article from the NYTs. Occasionally they actually try to tell it like it is. Was in this situation.[/QUOTE]
NYT is the non-MSM? Or is NYT the MSM?
See, MSM doesn’t exist except as a vague, undefineable political reference.
You should stop using it if you want to be taken seriously.
[QUOTE=hungryjoe;3013623]Evidence please. This is your treasured yardstick, claimed anyway. Cause Bullshido.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BackFistMonkey;3013625]only the idiots of the world ask to prove a negative Joe… you’re not an idiot. PLZ stop.[/QUOTE]
You can prove a negative. Formally. You’re thinking of arguing from ignorance, which is not the same thing.
It’s a folk myth that you can’t prove a negative. People who propagate this lie are never actual logicians.
I want evidence of this beast called “MSM” that only a subset of Americans seem to use to describe …some thing. I wonder if it’s a sign they’ve been programmed.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013624]NYT is the non-MSM? Or is NYT the MSM?
See, MSM doesn’t exist except as a vague, undefineable political reference.
You should stop using it if you want to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
Yeah
Obtuse it is.
note
In the, as Dr Bill put it, “Hungry Joe period”. Come at me bro.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013628]You can prove a negative. Formally.
It’s a folk myth that you can’t.
People who propagate this lie are never actual logicians.[/QUOTE]
No, it all.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013628]You can prove a negative. Formally. You’re thinking of arguing from ignorance, which is not the same thing.
It’s a folk myth that you can’t prove a negative. People who propagate this lie are never actual logicians.
I want evidence of this beast called “MSM” that only a subset of Americans seem to use. I wonder if it’s a sign they’ve been programmed.[/QUOTE]
Prove Unicorns aren’t real motherfuker!!!
Somebody should put together a link analysis of known associations between Russian intelligence and
and see who wins! Based on what’s been confirmed in the news thus far, I can see why the DOJ thought Trump might be a Russian asset.
But a Russian asset couldn’t possibly win the Presidency. There’s no evidence that is possible…
[QUOTE=BackFistMonkey;3013633]Prove Unicorns aren’t real motherfuker!!![/QUOTE]
The absence of Unicorn evidence does not prove they don’t exist, but also, the absence of evidence that Unicorns do not exist does not prove they do exist.
Therefore, Unicorns might exist. But to use any of that to argue that Unicorns do exist (because we don’t know) is the Argument from Ignorance.
On the other hand, the statement that {n, +} is finite is provably false.
The “MSM” is a Unicorn the same way MAGA is a unicorn.
Donald Trump loves living in the Land of Make Believe.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;3013644]The “MSM” is a Unicorn the same way MAGA is a unicorn.
Donald Trump loves living in the Land of Make Believe.[/QUOTE]
Take your blinders off.
[QUOTE=BackFistMonkey;3013645]God damn it!
Bill, dude.
Virgins exist … just not after they fuck a horny horse.
…
sigh
You people are driving me crazy.[/QUOTE]
A Unicorn is not a horse.
I can prove horses exist. I can also prove they don’t not exist, because negation.
[QUOTE=Dr. Gonzo;3013649]Many Zombie Apocalypse preppers don’t include Fiber supplements into their prep.
This is a mistake.[/QUOTE]
Fiber can be grown in the field. Seriously, why pack something you can just plant along the road.
[QUOTE=submessenger;3013654]Sidebar apologies…
My son likes to ask Alexa to tell jokes when he’s prepping for bed. Here’s a recent Alexa joke:[/QUOTE]
Alexa, wrong again.