[QUOTE=doofaloofa;2760658]
I only made it half way through
[/QUOTE]
It’s best to just skim Chuck’s posts until he learns to post less. He’s stuck in perpetual essay-writing mode.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760625]Gymnastics, swimming, and the sprints in track are the magic events.
[/QUOTE]
You’re sharp.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;2760689]
You’re sharp.[/QUOTE]
Non-US members may not know which events dominate US TV coverage.
As always, W. Rabbit, I will assign your editorial advice its proper weight in my reflections.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760840]Non-US members may not know which events dominate US TV coverage.
[/QUOTE]
Trust me, few non-US or US members actually read your essay-long posts to find such useful information, Professor Intellectual Humility.
Do you really think a suggestion to post more concisely is bad advice, or do you just get pissy when people point out your long-windedness?
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760840]
As always, W. Rabbit, I will assign your editorial advice its proper weight in my reflections.[/QUOTE]
Good, next try reflecting on (the length of) your own advice.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;2760843]Trust me, few non-US or US members actually read your essay-long posts to find such useful information.[/QUOTE]
No, shit-for-brains, your whining about that point was (by implication) that the point was too obvious. My response is: it wasn’t, for non-US members, you fucking dullard. Try to keep your uninteresting, pointless carping straight.
The rest was too stupid. I quit reading.
From now on, whenever Wabbykins does one of his “I’m not a mod but I play one on the internet” posts telling me how to post, my response will be
YOU’RE NOT A MOD. SUCK A GOAT’S ANUS, WANNABE!
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760854]My response is: it wasn’t, for non-US members, you fucking dullard.[/quote]
No, your response was a massive wall of text few Bullies have the time to read. Your response to ME was “for non-US members”. See what I did there? I forced you to get to the point by criticizing your essay version.
You can thank me another time.
You could have taken that critical feedback and shut the fuck up, but (as usual) you choose to get angry and throw some language in.
At least you’ve shortened your posts, so I win.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760854]
From now on, whenever Wabbykins does one of his “I’m not a mod but I play one on the internet” posts telling me how to post, my response will be
[/QUOTE]
Chuck, in what ivory tower does giving someone critical feedback about their posting style (yours is horrible) in an open forum make me “playing a mod”? Are you stoned?
You’re pretty stupid for a college boy.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2760854]From now on, whenever Wabbykins does one of his “I’m not a mod but I play one on the internet” posts telling me how to post, my response will be
YOU’RE NOT A MOD. SUCK A GOAT’S ANUS, WANNABE![/QUOTE]
Concise!
I was watching this killer asteroid fly by the Earth today and could see Chuck’s post from space.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;2760914]I was watching this killer asteroid fly by the Earth today and could see Chuck’s post from space.[/QUOTE]
A killer asteroid made of reflective material?
[QUOTE=Vieux Normand;2760930]A killer asteroid made of reflective material?[/QUOTE]
All asteroids are made of reflective materials. In fact, asteroids are classified by their reflectance.
suck a goat’s anus, wannabe.
[QUOTE=doofaloofa;2760915]Dont listen to wabbit Chuck
Your allright[/QUOTE]
fixed
[QUOTE=doofaloofa;2760998]surely you mean albedo?[/QUOTE]
He means the material in killer asterrhoids is both reflective and it magnifies enough that he can read a wall-of-text reflected from a rock 27,000 KM distant.
Duh.
[QUOTE=doofaloofa;2760998]surely you mean albedo?[/QUOTE]
Actually, both, but reflectance doesn’t mean that they work as mirrors, silly Wabbit.
“The first step to understanding the relationships
within a group of diverse objects is to classify them
according to their physical characteristics. Many researchers
have classified asteroids based on various criteria.
Tholen and Barucci [1989] have recently presented
a comprehensive review of the various taxonomies
that have been put forth. These taxonomies
are all based on similarities in the reflectance spectra
and in some cases the albedos of the objects. The spectrum
is related to the surface composition, so any taxonomy
based on these data is at least in some way related
to the surface composition of the asteroid. However,
many asteroid spectra do not have unique compositional
interpretations.”
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761022]Actually, both, but reflectance doesn’t mean that they work as mirrors, silly Wabbit.
[/QUOTE]
You’re the silly bitch who can’t read.
Show me where I said anything about mirrors.
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;2761028]You’re the silly bitch.
Show me where I said anything about mirrors.[/QUOTE]
There, there Pwincess. So pissy. You implied and accepted without correction that you saw my post reflected in an asteroid. That’s reflected, as in a mirror. Then you defended the claim that asteroids are reflective in that sense by saying that they are classified by reflectance. YOU connected those ideas, Pwincess Wabbykins. I didn’t make you do it. I just casually implied that it came out of your usual superficiality of knowledge.
You have the intellectual depth of a drip of piss under the urinal on the edge of a well-functioning drain. Your wiki-knowledge of asteroids didn’t teach you that the reflectance of different wavelengths in the spectrum used to classify different asteroids (based debatedly on what it implies about their composition) has very little to do with their being “reflective” in the second-graders sense that you understand.
It is becoming clearer why you like posts short and simple. I’ll try to get a six-year-old to translate other posters’ messages to your level, Pwincess Wabbykins.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761029]There, there Pwincess. So pissy. You said that you saw my post reflected in an asteroid.
[/quote]
Nope. That’s not what I said. You’ve got to lay off the LSD Chuck.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761029]
That’s reflected, as in a mirror.
[/quote]
So you’re making it up as you go. The mirror was never anything I said anywhere, it’s your own hallucination? Got it.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761029]
Then you defended the claim that asteroids are reflective
[/quote]
Nope did no such thing. Another lie. What the fuck did you do at college Chuck? I think you just partied and skipped class, right?
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761029]
Your wiki-knowledge of asteroids didn’t teach you that the reflectance of different wavelengths in the spectrum used to classify different asteroids (based debatedly on what it implies about their composition) has very little to do with their being “reflective” in the second-graders sense that you understand.
[/quote]
Another strawman. Sad. And very ironic too, all things considered.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761029]
It is becoming clearer why you like posts short and simple. I’ll try to get a six-year-old to translate other posters’ messages to your level, Pwincess Wabbykins.[/QUOTE]
Everyone likes posts short and simple but not a motormouth like yourself.
Pwincess Wabbykins has gone back to its practice of lying by quoting partial sentences.
Since I’m sure everyone who isn’t mentally impaired who cares (if there is any such person) can go up a few posts and see where he idiotically claimed in answering Vieux Normand that Asteroids are reflective in the sense they were both discussing and he connected this to their being classified by reflectance, I’m not going to play his bullshit games. (Posts ## 61, 63, and 64 are the relevant ones.)
Pwincess Wabbykins, you are a science ignoramus, your philosophical pretentions are hilarious (that life bullshit in the gong sau thread had me in stitches), and you have no intellectual depth. Sorry, Wabbykins, you are a poser (as the kids say). A pseudo-intellectual with all the heft of a bunny’s tail puff.
You are a zero who tries to get off on bossing other people around because you are a failure.
SUCK A GOAT’S ANUS, WANNABE!
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761051]
he idiotically claimed in answering Vieux Normand that Asteroids are reflective in the sense they were both discussing
[/QUOTE]
When you sober up and go check what I actually said to Vieux, you’ll see I did no such thing.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761051]
Pwincess Wabbykins, you are a science ignoramus,
[/QUOTE]
I’m far more qualified to discuss the science of asteroids and EM than you are, hence the irony of your claim here, and why I won’t actually debate your Google-fu. You’ve gone off the deep end…something about “mirrors” and putting words in my mouth.
Sorry Chuck, rhetoric and your liberal arts bullshit combined with Google do not make you appear as intelligent as you’d hoped.
You’ll never be Bullshido’s resident “brainiac”, as you are apparently shooting for.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761051]
your philosophical pretentions are hilarious (that life bullshit in the gong sau thread had me in stitches), and you have no intellectual depth.
[/QUOTE]
Ok Mr. Intellectual Humility.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761051]
Sorry, Wabbykins, you are a poser (as the kids say). A pseudo-intellectual with all the heft of a bunny’s tail puff.
[/QUOTE]
It’s spelled poseur, you dumb college twat.
[QUOTE=ChuckWepner;2761051]
You are a zero who tries to get off on bossing other people around because you are a failure.
[/QUOTE]
You’re a windbag Bullshido noob who should lurk more and post much, much less.
Still going to play Chuck? Maybe you should go grab some fresh air and release some of that bottled up anger.
Removed from: http://www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?t=119856
[QUOTE=W. Rabbit;2761059]Lies, various stupid and ignorant claims, vague bragging about qualifications that turned out in other threads to be a Master’s degree in Computer Science, which makes ME, PWINCESS WABBIT, QWEEN OF AWW KNOWWEDGE! Various attempts to avoid the fact that I am so ignorant that I think reflectance has to do with how well something would work as a reflector.
[/QUOTE]
Fixed.
Go ahead and claim the title “Resident Brainiac” on the website, sweetcheeks. You have a mental age of about 5.
Neither of us has any academic qualification relevant to current astrophysics, you stooge. Your academic training is about as relevant to asteroids as a certificate in VCR repair would be. If you had any relevant qualification, I’m sure Cullion would have heard all about it.
I just think it’s funny that you pretend to be Mr. Science and try to lord your wisdom about science over others, but in doing so you make elementary mistakes that show that you don’t know the difference between reflectivity, reflectance, and albedo. I’m not an expert on recent astrophysics or optics, but I know enough to tell that you were talking out your ass (as did doofaloofa; albedo is related to reflecting light in the relevant sense).
BTW, poser and poseur are different (though related) terms, you semi-literate dumbfuck. The term popular on the internet and with people under 30 is “poser.” You don’t rate “poseur,” Pwincess.
Anyway, as is becoming the tradition, I now leave the litter box to you. Offer whatever other fantasies and lies you want. I’m not going to return to this fine thread. You can have the last word as well as the first.
In fact, since you never respond to the content of my posts, and I have grown bored with your pseudo-modding and your thread-derailing whining, I have concluded that you have nothing of interest to say to me and you are ineducable. I leave you with one final
SUCK A GOAT’S ANUS, WANNABE