Interracial Hooking up and Ignorant Sheep

[QUOTE=scipio;2689271]Almost true - just under 2 million and declining each year. The Daily Mail readership is declining rapidly (same as other papers) DMGT who own the paper now gets most of it’s revenue from non-Daily Mail business and is looking long term at what life will be when the Daily Mail goes the way of the Daily Express.

It might be giving the readership what they want but the readership is currently abandoning them.[/QUOTE]
I rounded all the numbers to their nearest whole number, because I couldn’t be bothered to type out the exact figures.

All the print papers are haemorrhaging readers. Nowadays you really have to include how many hits their website gets to get a genuine picture of readership.

Interestingly I’ve noticed that many Americans post links to DM articles when it comes to stuff associated with Britain and indeed the rest of the world. I wonder how widely read the online version is in the US.

I imagine it chimes much better with mainstream American opinion than the Grauniad and probablymore so than the Torygraph.

[QUOTE=judoka_uk;2689279]I rounded all the numbers to their nearest whole number, because I couldn’t be bothered to type out the exact figures.

All the print papers are haemorrhaging readers. Nowadays you really have to include how many hits their website gets to get a genuine picture of readership.

Interestingly I’ve noticed that many Americans post links to DM articles when it comes to stuff associated with Britain and indeed the rest of the world. I wonder how widely read the online version is in the US.

I imagine it chimes much better with mainstream American opinion than the Grauniad and probablymore so than the Torygraph.[/QUOTE]

The reason for the links that the US are getting to DM sites is that about 18 months ago Daily Mail on-line (don’t confuse this as having the same content/editorial team as the paper based DM) moved a large part of it’s operations to the US openning offices in LA and NY. DM On-Line has been VERY succesful in becoming a major on line news portal and is now rivalling a number of the well known news portal sites.

It is worth pointing out that other than the Daily Mail name the news content is different, it tends to be more “gossipy/celeb” than the paper based version of the Daily Mail - it has a different editorial team.

The Mail website is excellent for a bit of perving on birds in bikinis, that is true.

[QUOTE=judoka_uk;2689315]The Mail website is excellent for a bit of perving on birds in bikinis, that is true.[/QUOTE]

So what the fuck more do you want? News?

[QUOTE=The Question;2689375]So what the fuck more do you want? News?[/QUOTE]
Some decent high def Rihanna nudes would be nice.

[QUOTE=judoka_uk;2689382]Some decent high def Rihanna nudes would be nice.[/QUOTE]

Plain or battered?

Banging white chicks or not, my problem with Usain Bolt is that he didn’t show the world how amazing a record he could set. My geek self actually yelled “don’t increase your drag coefficient” at my television.

Speaking of good times, welcome back Q.

What I want to know:

Is being known as “the world’s fastest man” a good thing for making it with the ladies?

Because I can see some serious drawback to that nickname when it comes to sexy time…

Who wouldn’t bang white chicks if they could? They’re the most beautiful creatures on Earth.

[QUOTE=Devil;2691186]Who wouldn’t bang white chicks if they could? They’re the most beautiful creatures on Earth.[/QUOTE]

Have you ever been to Wall-Mart?

[QUOTE=Devil;2691186]Who wouldn’t bang white chicks if they could? They’re the most beautiful creatures on Earth.[/QUOTE]
Lol, did anyone in this thread even hint to possibly take this bait? Common Devil, where’s your A-game?

[QUOTE=Tom .C;2691191]Have you ever been to Wall-Mart?[/QUOTE]

Bell curve, motherfucker! Bell curve!

[QUOTE=Tranquil Suit;2691196]Lol, did anyone in this thread even hint to possibly take this bait? Common Devil, where’s your A-game?[/QUOTE]

Not even trolling.

[QUOTE=Robstafarian;2691130]Banging white chicks or not, my problem with Usain Bolt is that he didn’t show the world how amazing a record he could set. My geek self actually yelled “don’t increase your drag coefficient” at my television.

Speaking of good times, welcome back Q.[/QUOTE]

Waddup homie.

They say Bolt is going to bring that shit at the olypics in Summer. Light up London and all that shit. Let’s hope he gets his drag coefficient under control and cuts the showboating.

[QUOTE=Devil;2691186]Who wouldn’t bang white chicks if they could? They’re the most beautiful creatures on Earth.[/QUOTE]

Yo, dude, I love a white chick, with the booty enormous. But you have to go looking for that shit. You have to look hard. But when you do find it. Bring on the motherfucking vanilla son. That milkshake brings me to her yard. Also, that yard better be fucking well tended to. Don’t want to bush encroaching on the front porch. Nah mean?

I also like black chicks. Love a black chick. And asian chicks. Damn, love an asian chick. And Latina chicks. Love a latina. Sometimes they speak spanish. That shit is awesome. mmmm. Delicious.

[QUOTE=The Question;2691215]Yo, dude, I love a white chick, with the booty enormous. But you have to go looking for that shit. You have to look hard. But when you do find it. Bring on the motherfucking vanilla son. That milkshake brings me to her yard. Also, that yard better be fucking well tended to. Don’t want to bush encroaching on the front porch. Nah mean?

I also like black chicks. Love a black chick. And asian chicks. Damn, love an asian chick. And Latina chicks. Love a latina. Sometimes they speak spanish. That shit is awesome. mmmm. Delicious.[/QUOTE]

Enormous asses are unappealing.

[QUOTE=Devil;2691218]Enormous asses are unappealing.[/QUOTE]

Motherfucker, this view point has been proven wrong scientifically.

Allow me to expand:

If size of ass = a, cuteness = b, and boob size = c,
The overall appeal must be equal to c+a+b, no doubt.

So if white = x, and black = y, then z must be equal to you shutting your mouth.

There is a point of diminishing returns with ass size. It’s difficult to pinpoint that threshold, but it lies somewhere between Jennifers Aniston and Lopez.

Ahem, Kelly Divine.

[QUOTE=Tranquil Suit;2691234]Ahem, Kelly Divine.[/QUOTE]

I had to Google that skank. She has way too much ass. I considered calling it disgusting but reconsidered as that may have been a bit harsh.