The Brit media is notoriously sloppy and goes with the sensational they see SEALs mentioned in my background and figure it sounds better if they make me seem like a crazed Navy SEAL. I don’t know how much people on Bullshido have dealt with the National/Intl Media but it isnt something you can necessarily control after the interview. It’s part of the biz and all I can do is control what I can control and try to retract any mis information.
[/QUOTE]
Sweeping generalisation. So the British media disregard factual accuracy, even if you tell them they’re printing lies that could get you into serious trouble?
[QUOTE=thl144;2619399]
I can only point out that I’ve reached millions with my free information, sold hundreds of thousands my information products, and taught tens of thousands in over 52 countries in the last 20+ years with a ridiculously small refund/return rate. If I was a fraud that couldn’t occur even with the best marketing. So I stand on my own record and I have no issue with forums like this if people want to ask me legit questions like yours.[/QUOTE]
Not even a good circumstantial indicator of legitimacy.
I’m beginning to think you’re pathologically unable to help yourself and can’t wait to jump on any fucking band wagon you see.
Are you some fucking EMO kid with parental problems which cause you to vent your angst on these forums ?
Seriously, if you couldn’t see the line of questioning going on in the Larkin MABS thread then you need to stay the fuck out of that forum, if you post once more like that I’LL BAN YOU MYSELF.
It’s fucking idiots like you who fuck-up investigative threads.[/QUOTE]
Really? Our papers print retractions, because they’re legally obligated to do so.
So should there not be documented evidence of this if he was actually telling the truth?
I was hardly rude, I just dont see how his answer provided anything.
I realise I dived into that one, but Im going to go have a look for some of them there retractions.
[QUOTE=Rock Ape;2619432]If you wanted to be helpful rather than antagonistic, why not approach the paper directly and question them on how they came about that information?
But don’t bother, it’s been done.[/QUOTE]
Ok, not going to email the Sun then. Just going through old articles currently. The Independant seems to be (as expected) the most factually accurate and explanitory.
I didnt realise there was such a vocal opposition to him teaching over here.
In this instance I disagree 100% with Rock Ape and the bandwagon comment.
The cull, infraction, and removal of juggernoobs shit posting is 100% correct. Don’t think because the thread is about you, that shitting in the thread is fine. You got your passive-aggressive insult in and I warned everyone. Plus, I got mine in as well.
As of right now anyone that does not approach this in a respective manner will receive a temp ban. This is not YMAS keep the responses appropriate even if you feel Larkin is acting like a passive aggressive butt-hurt bitch and name calling.
Anyone, Larkin included, that wants to act up here is your thread.
It wasn’t moved by him it was moved by me. You have every right to respond just not in that thread. Just like juggernoob has every right to respond to you the way he did just not in that thread.
Personally I had no issue with the comments from Jugger or the other guy I’m just new to the forum and didn’t realize the protocols and the fact that that thread wasn’t the area to respond. I realize people have questions and also want to fire away at me personally. It comes with the territory.
