It seems that this site claims the Boston bombings were in fact fake, a conspiracy, and that the victims were actors.
The author provided some pics (gore), and with the aid of appeal to authority, continued to claim it improbable because there wasn’t enough blood, etc.
He focused on a double amputated vic, mainly.
My opinion was of the contrary, and that in fact it is totally possible not to bleed out in under two minutes even with an amputation. That there are cases were the body especialy in shock will constrict its arteries so hard the the stumps would hardly bleed for a short while.
They refused to post my comment about the plausibility of less bleeding, and that it actually looked like a lot of bombing scenes.
What is this crap? a tasteless troll job? Or do they really believe that weirdness?
[QUOTE=erezb;2773831]My opinion was of the contrary, and that in fact it is totally possible not to bleed out in under two minutes even with an amputation. That there are cases were the body especialy in shock will constrict its arteries so hard the the stumps would hardly bleed for a short while.[/QUOTE]Seriously. Are you fucking capable of a reasonable opinion.
I’ve just spent the last fucking decade + within warfare where troops are loosing multiple limbs - that’s known as “CATASTROPHIC” in terms of bleed classification.
The only way a person will have any chance of survival from just one clear explosive amputation is to arrest the bleeds, this can often take 2 or more specially designed tourniquet and these be applied in UNDER 2 minutes from the point of injury.
During the Falklands conflict, there were a limited number of British soldiers who suffered major injuries including explosive amputation of limbs who, were able to self administer a wound dressing however, they survived due to the very low ambient temperatures of a winter in the South Atlantic. These cases influenced how futrure battlefield major trauma and shock induced blood loss were treated.
However, the risks of bleeding out after such catastrophic injury, especially trauma caused by explosion are much greater and far more likely than the minuscule percentage of those who may have survived.
As usual erezb, you’re talking out of your fucking ass. Please shut the fuck up
[QUOTE=erezb;2773831]
My opinion was of the contrary, and that in fact it is totally possible not to bleed out in under two minutes even with an amputation. That there are cases were the body especialy in shock will constrict its arteries so hard the the stumps would hardly bleed for a short while.[/QUOTE]
Kindly find your femoral arteries.
Now please open them.
That done, you need only relax and wait for those arteries to constrict so that they will “hardly bleed”.