Here’s a bit of clinical statistica, based on self-reporting, of course.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/j517r35408304087/
Watch the size-bragging phobics triangle themselves…
The vagina can only stretch so much.
What kind of cruel gift of the magi game is god playing, where to be big mostly likely means you’re gay?
Lolfagtag?
These results reflect the obvious truth that women seek to deprive us of our life essence, with their devious plot to sap and impurify our bodily fluids.
Excellent find. I think the mystery of homophobia has just been solved.
Learn to cook and recycle.
According to this study I am gay lol … therefore I conclude, never trust any statistics you didn’t cook up your self.
No, according to the statics (and yourself) you’re more likely to be gay.
Yup yup.
I know but since this is BS there is only black and white, BJJ or not gay.
Perhaps all that the statistics show is that gay men are more likely to exaggerate the size of their penises.
If you would have read the study you would have known that they ruled that out…
Edit: A little joke on the matter: “Why are most American men circumcised?”
“American women won’t take anything unless it is 10% off”:5slick:
Did you get access to the whole study? Because the abstract says this:
Penile dimensions were assessedusing five measures of penile length and circumferencefrom Kinsey’s original protocol. On all fivemeasures, homosexual men reported larger penises thandid heterosexual men.
Which implies that the scientists didn’t measure the dudes themselves.
Provide that evidence plz.
It might still be a selection bias, IE only large-dicked sexually forward people are likely to stick out a study on dick size.
Start reading at page 219 last paragraph on “systemic error”
So you read over 200 hundred pages looking for pictures, huh? You must be huge!
How did you get access to the whole article?
Did you even bothered to download the study?
Edit: @The Q there is a pdf download…