Exerpted:
April 24, 2005
Guest Viewpoint: Legislature ought never forget ‘The People’
Every two years, the Oregon Legislature convenes to conduct “The People’s” business. At least that’s the stated purpose of every bill that is introduced: All legislation begins with the words, “Be It Enacted By The People Of The State Of Oregon …”
With that profound statement, the sponsors of a bill profess to speak for “The People” of this great state. In a typical session, several thousand bills are introduced.
Anyone who reviews every bill - a daunting task - will find plenty of examples where “The People” would likely agree with the sponsors. Thankfully, many legislators go to Salem intending first and foremost to represent their constituents. They understand, correctly, that it was for this purpose that they were elected.
But there are also numerous cases where “The People,” if they had their way, would consign a bill to the recycling bin. These are bills typically born of powerful special interest lobbying or legislators putting their own agendas ahead of “The People’s” business.
The number of bills in the 2005 session is smaller than usual so far. But the mixture is typical in that it includes the good, the bad and the downright silly.
Many good bills have been introduced. Among them are about a dozen to crack down on Oregon’s methamphetamine epidemic (e.g., Senate Bills 375 through 379). There is an anti-spyware bill (House Bill 2302) and several measures (such as HB 2365) to undo the nonsensical school zone speed law from the 2003 session.
SB 295, aimed at the Coburg speed (revenue) trap, and SB 624, to prohibit insurers from using credit history as part of rate determination, are part of the “good” mix. So are bills such as our own HB 2484 to give citizens a greater voice in public processes.
These are only some of the current bills that most Oregonians would likely agree are “The People’s” business. They are responsible measures aimed at addressing real issues. However, many other bills would almost certainly never be enacted by “The People.”
Arguably heading the bad category is SB 769 which would authorize in-state college tuition for illegal aliens. Close behind is HB 2331 to revoke the annual minimum wage adjustment - a direct violation of a voter mandate. These and other similarly irresponsible bills should never even have been introduced.
Every session has its downright silly bills. Leading the 2005 list are HB 2344 and HB 2503 to require schools to provide martial arts training. Both are declared to be “emergency” measures! Joining them in silliness is SB 905 to rename the Historic Columbia River Highway in honor of Ronald Reagan. Such measures do nothing but waste the Legislature’s time, and these aren’t the only examples.
Full aritcle at
http://www.registerguard.com/news/2005/04/24/ed.col.ritter.0424.html
Hah, more MA in schools legislation news.
Surely there can be more than adding MA to a school’s curriculum if the real intent is to combat the epidemic of obesity.