[QUOTE=FinalLegion;2621021]It’s probably because I’m argumentative person, which is a bit of a flaw, I know…but it’s also because I don’t like it when someone tries to me I’m arguing for the wrong thing…but not I’m not even arguing for the thing they think I am. If IIF would just get that he’s accusing me of arguing for something that I never touched on…there wouldn’t be an argument.[/QUote] Where did I tell you that you were arguing for the wrong thing? I notice that “they” you just slipped in. Don’t get all messed up because BKR pissed you off.
[QUOTE=It is Fake;2621024]Where did I tell you that you were arguing for the wrong thing? I notice that “they” you just slipped in. Don’t get all messed up because BKR pissed you off.[/QUOTE]
You’ve been trying to tell me that you can’t call something good or bad without any experience with it (which I stated was true)…and that I’ve been doing this very thing.
I haven’t been. Never once did I assign a subjective ‘good’ or ‘bad’ to the DNBK. I’ve only spoken of it in terms of pure historicity.
You’ve been telling me that a person can’t discuss the history of something without having experience with it.
I’ve pointed out how ludicrous that is because, quite frankly, that’s a ludicrous position.
Clear? Can we drop this now?
You’ve been trying to tell me that you can’t call something good or bad without any experience with it (which I stated was true)…and that I’ve been doing this very thing.
No, I never said that anywhere. Get the quote. You said You never said good/bad.
I pointed out that legit is related and can be read as “good.”
You’ve been telling me that a person can’t discuss the history of something without having experience with it.
I’ve pointed out how ludicrous that is because, quite frankly, that’s a ludicrous position.
Yes, and please show me where I said you can’t discuss history without having experience.
No, not what your anger forced you to infer.
[QUOTE=FinalLegion;2621023]Sure. Why not? Do we not use the term ‘legit’ to separate people and organizations in terms of those who are good and those that are bad?[/quote]Yes, related words that that can carry the same meaning. It depends on the context and the reader.
“Yeah, after 14 years, I’d say he’s a pretty good source.”
Yes, a related word that can carry the same meaning. It depends on the context and the reader.
What, you never use slang?
What, you never use related words?
[QUOTE=It is Fake;2621028]No, I never said that anywhere. Get the quote. Yes, and please show me where I said you can’t discuss history without having experience.
No, not what your anger forced you to infer. [/QUOTE]
From post #680, you said, [I]“My point is that you need experience with something before deeming it good or bad.”
[/I]I never said anything about the DNBK being good or bad. Maybe you inferred I did, but I never applied any subjective measure to the DNBK.
In post #682, you said, “You are now speaking in absolutes. Historians? Hell any historian worth their salt will tell you that much of what they say is based on assumptions because they weren’t there and many things are educated guesses.”…which indicates that you are intimating that without direct experience of something, you can’t discuss it’s history.
Now, here’s something…could be we’ve both been incorrectly inferring what the other guy was trying to say…and if that’s the case, I say we drop it and just go back to making fun of YakYak.
LOL, my second or what, third trollshido, whoopee. Just shows what being bored and grouchy at work will lead to.
[QUOTE=BKR;2621035]LOL, my second or what, third trollshido, whoopee. Just shows what being bored and grouchy at work will lead to.[/QUOTE]
If it makes you feel any better, I think IIF just wanted somewhere to pick on legion without filling a thread up with waffle.
Good move, I think.
[QUOTE=FinalLegion;2621033]
[/I]I never said anything about the DNBK being good or bad. Maybe you inferred I did, but I never applied any subjective measure to the DNBK.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FinalLegion;2620971]If I did, I’m sure they would say “No”. Why bring a legit society into this?[/QUOTE]Circles, already discussed. Now, I notice you missed every part where I told you what to do or what you can’t discuss.
This is already moved, so go ahead and rub one out for the DNBK.
[QUOTE=The Juggernoob;2621038]If it makes you feel any better, I think IIF just wanted somewhere to pick on legion without filling a thread up with waffle.
Good move, I think.[/QUOTE]
It’s cheap entertainment to say the least.
[QUOTE=It is Fake;2621040]Circles, already discussed. Now, I notice you missed every part where I told you what to do or what you can’t discuss.
This is already moved, so go ahead and rub one out for the DNBK.[/QUOTE]
I think FinalLegion is channeling yakyak at this point.
[QUOTE=BKR;2621035]LOL, my second or what, third trollshido, whoopee. Just shows what being bored and grouchy at work will lead to.[/QUOTE]
It has absolutely nothing to do with you. You don’t seem like you’ll short out your computer crying over a trollshido thread.
I’m actually surprised this didn’t get dumped here sooner.