David Soard Chinese Shao-Lin Center/Shaollin-Do Pleads Guilty to Harrasment

http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_13423591

Kung Fu instructor gets probation
Boulder Shaolin master was accused of sexual assault but pleaded to harassment
By Erica Meltzer and John Aguilar Camera Staff Writers
Boulder Daily Camera
Posted:

A longtime Boulder Shaolin Kung Fu instructor accused of sexually abusing students must continue with mandatory counseling, serve two years of probation and avoid contact with any of his victims, a judge ordered Friday. David Soard, 55, had been charged with sexual assault and attempted sexual contact against two of his female students.

Kupfner said practitioners of Shaolin enter into an intense relationship with their instructors and change nearly every aspect of their lives, from the friends they keep to the food they eat. When Soard made sexual advances on his students, they often were too shocked or upset to actively resist, he said.

Judge Maria Berkenkotter said she would accept the sentence of two years’ probation agreed to by both sides, but she expressed concern about Soard’s attitude.

“In all the victim impact statements that I read in relation to this case, one line really stands out: ‘Submission is not the same thing as consent,’” Berkenkotter said. “In speaking just now, he indicates he still believes these contacts were consensual, and he does not understand the power he holds.”

The bold plus bullshido and research made me quit instructing.

Its sounds like a cult, with some sex abuse thrown in for good measure.

Ya know…

NVM.

Cynthia Clark slept with more Kung Fu Students than David Soard ever did.

[quote=jumpingbum;2293179]Cynthia Clark slept with more Kung Fu Students than David Soard ever did.[/quote]Proof or GTFO.

Even if that were true, it is still irrelevant to this thread. If you have evidence of wrongdoing, or potential ongoing harm that she might present, I’d encourage you to start a separate thread and post it; Instead of trying to distract from the case being discussed.

  • She is not accused of abusing her position of authority as an instructor.
  • None of her relationships (or non-relationships) were forced
  • She was one of the accusers in these cases, not the accused.
David Soard However:
  • Is the Accused, not one of the victims.
  • Is accused of abusing his position of authority as an instructor.
  • Tried to force himself on multiple women and apparently does not "understand the social cues other people". :bs:
  • Presents a very real potential threat to his students, present and in the future.
That David Soard slept with multiple students, or had extra-marital affairs is not the issue here. That he abused both his position of authority and the trust his students placed in him is the issue. What he was accused of is the issue here, and attacking the people that called him on it and stood up to him is not appropriate.

and you are who?

Bring something to the discussion or shut up. You must be female because, you went right to the “slut” implication.

I should have been clearer, IIF, and I apologize. Cynthia Clark tore apart the Colorado Springs school and her marriage about 5 years ago by sleeping around. It wasn’t about the sex, it was what she did to everyone around her. I found it ironic that she brought charges against Master David given her own behavior.

Interesting. You should have stuck with the simple sentence replies. This is some stupid shit.

Basically, you just threw up the"she’s a hooker therefore, hooker’s can’t be raped." argument. Yes, it is as bad as the Hitler argument.

I should have been clearer, IIF, and I apologize. Cynthia Clark tore apart the Colorado Springs school and her marriage about 5 years ago by sleeping around. It wasn’t about the sex, it was what she did to everyone around her. I found it ironic that she brought charges against Master David given her own behavior.

So, people that sleep around can’t be attacked and degraded? Yes, that is exactly how I read your post. If Cynthia is who I think, I know exactly what she did better than you. It has no bearing on what David Soard was convicted of in the first place.

Let’s take it a step further. Lets say she did what you implied and asked for what she alleged or lied. WTH is a married man running around with an alleged promiscuous woman? I mean if she tore up the school, like you allege, he should have known better. He is married.

If we are going to spout hearsay I can tell you stories of things I witnessed and conversation I had with people before you ever thought about Joining the CSC schools.

I’m surprised that anyone ever came forward. E-v-e-r.

Dear IIF,

I have tried to send you a private message. Either the people in charge of this site hate Macs or I’m a moron. My point has nothing to do with whether someone is a slut or not and everything to do with the pot calling the kettle black. Period. I simply found it ironic that someone who had basically done the same thing went to the cops. Irony, it’s an interesting concept, no?

And I’d love to hear your hearsay, in a private message. If I can ever figure this site out.

[quote=jumpingbum;2293777]Dear IIF,

I have tried to send you a private message. Either the people in charge of this site hate Macs or I’m a moron. My point has nothing to do with whether someone is a slut or not and everything to do with the pot calling the kettle black. Period. I simply found it ironic that someone who had basically done the same thing went to the cops. Irony, it’s an interesting concept, no?[/quote]

Two married people having affairs is not the same as one abusing power.

never mind. at least now I know who the moron is in the conversation.

[quote=jumpingbum;2294185]never mind. at least now I know who the moron is in the conversation.[/quote]Finally looked in a mirror. Good Job.

Sleeping around is the same as Sexual Harassment or Rape. Really.

Wow.

[quote=It is Fake;2294216]Finally looked in a mirror. Good Job.

Sleeping around is the same as Sexual Harassment or Rape. Really.

Wow.[/quote]

Yeah, that was an intelligent response. Now, use some of that intelligence, re-read what I wrote and maybe just maybe you’ll come to understand that I wasn’t equating ANYONE’s actions to ANYONE ELSE’s actions.

I’ll use small words so you can understand:

I said that it was IRONIC (definition of irony: a. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning) that Ms. Clark filed charges against Mr. Soard.

Period.

Let me know when you grow a brain.

See this is ironic because:

never mind. at least now I know who the moron is in the conversation.

Now, use some of that intelligence, re-read what I wrote and maybe just maybe you’ll come to understand that I wasn’t equating ANYONE’s actions to ANYONE ELSE’s actions.
Ican’t I’m a moron. Smarter than you apparently but, still a moron.

I’ll use small words so you can understand:

It is quite okay no need to cover for your decencies.

I said that it was IRONIC (definition of irony: a. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning) that Ms. Clark filed charges against Mr. Soard.

Period.
Not my fault you don’t understand the use of irony and reading comprehension.

No what you said was

Cynthia Clark slept with more Kung Fu Students than David Soard ever did.

Since this is an article detailing his actions you are equating her sleeping around to sexual harassment.

There was no reference point in your post. Then you backtracked and kept adding more and more then you became emotional.

Let me know when you grow a brain.

Why you can’t remember what you wrote earlier you’ll just forget.

you’re funny.

You’re an idiot.

I was being polite to him. YOU, however, are a bitch.