jnp has several standard formulae, but all of them include using ‘Fora’ in a sentence. Using the same schemata over and over is getting a bit old.
are you suggesting a paradigm shift?
ut vos es ego quondam eram
quis ego sum vos mos fio
or so the voices say
the spice must flow!
Tom recently opined that only two things come from Texas, jnp.
He then made the observation that you were not in possession of any discernible horns.
I’m not entirely sure what he was driving at. However, he did finish the conversation by e-grabbing his e-balls, and then e-biting his e-thumb, which probably tasted of old crotch by this time.
Look kids, Tom and I feel that it’s not appropriate for mommy and daddy to fight in front of the children.
Man he looks scary in that mom wig.
Oh, and fora.
[quote=pauli;2359060]are you suggesting a paradigm shift?[/quote]No, “Paradigm” is not plural. I am suggesting jnp have numerous matricies for different contexts.
[quote=Uncle Skippy;2358930]jnp,
Tom Kagan said he vehemently disagrees with your viewpoint and believes that The Armory is not a part of the technique fora. In fact, Tom said he is going to make a post in the advanced grappling forum about “How Do Scissor Sweep?”[/quote]
I created one of the original threads in the Advanced forum by a non-grappler with a simple observation about differences in Ukemi between amateur wrestling and Judo which no one posting in the area could answer. It fell to me (a chunner!!!) to find any semblance of real answer.
The advanced grappling forum was one of the first areas on Bullshido which developed a strong sense of consistent credibility. Being mindful of this is important. Expanding the reach and scope of such consistent credibility is a damn good idea, but fraught with the inevitable consequence of trial and error. Balancing traffic and drama with genuine informative conversation isn’t easy.
Hey, that’s not what you said when we were in the store!
Draw up some graphs. This might prove to be amusing.
Figures.
The advanced grappling forum was one of the first areas on Bullshido which developed a strong sense of consistent credibility. Being mindful of this is important. Expanding the reach and scope of such consistent credibility is a damn good idea, but fraught with the inevitable consequence of trial and error. Balancing traffic and drama with genuine informative conversation isn’t easy.
Word.
Draw up some graphs. This might prove to be amusing.
[/quote]
DTT hasn’t returned my Sharpie.
FORA! FORA TO VICTORY!
There are only so many ways I can refer to the technique section, which is an inevitable necessity when I take the time to explain something to a poster who doesn’t understand why their post was removed. I’ve come up with six different ways to refer to the training area. Maybe you can do better.
In fact, I believe I recently wrote four PM’s to you trying to clarify training forum policy. Maybe instead of trying to explain things I should just give everyone infractions without explaining my position. That’s a good idea WW, thanks!
Now I don’t have to spend a significant portion of my time here trying to help some of you knotheads understand why, “That shit is pimp!” is not a post that belongs in the training FORA!
I’m fickle like that.
[quote=jnp;2359120]There are only so many ways I can refer to the technique section, which is an inevitable necessity when I take the time to explain something to a poster who doesn’t understand why their post was removed. I’ve come up with six different ways to refer to the training area. Maybe you can do better.
In fact, I believe I recently wrote four PM’s to you trying to clarify training forum policy. Maybe instead of trying to explain things I should just give everyone infractions without explaining my position. That’s a good idea WW, thanks!
Now I don’t have to spend a significant portion of my time here trying to help some of you knotheads understand why, “That shit is pimp!” is not a post that belongs in the training FORA!
I’m fickle like that.[/quote]
<Facepalm>
Dude, I’m just making a joke about obscure plural forms (Formulae, Schemata, Matricies). I am not actually criticizing you. I am just looking for chances to uses them in a sentence. For LOLs.
Lighten up.
Marines aren’t happy unless they are miserable.
i’m just waiting for you to find a less awkward verb than “to give an infraction.”
Then War Wheel can make what appears to be a joke only to himself by citing its obscure plural form.
[quote=War Wheel;2359125]<Facepalm>
Dude, I’m just making a joke about obscure plural forms (Formulae, Schemata, Matricies). I am not actually criticizing you. I am just looking for chances to uses them in a sentence. For LOLs.
Lighten up.[/quote]
I wasn’t being serious either. I tease people with a completely straight face in real life too.
You lighten up nerfherder.
Verb: to infract
Noun: Infracta, pl. Infractae
Also see: Infracticity (n)
[quote=jnp;2359133]I wasn’t being serious either. I tease people with a completely straight face in real life too.
You lighten up nerfherder.[/quote]
Isn’t it time for Wapner or something?
I’m an excellent driver.
It is decidedly so.