Cop Shoots 2/3 Attackers, Killing One

Multiple Attackers!

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl...ws/3630033.html

Richmond rookie officer’s training helped foil carjacking

By ROBERT CROWE
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

Holly Mong was just six months into her career as a police officer when she shot two armed men who tried to hijack her car outside her Jersey Village apartment.

Police said Mong, 22, a Richmond Police Department rookie, was wearing civilian clothes about 6:30 a.m. Tuesday when two suspects climbed into her Jeep Liberty and pointed guns at her head as she was starting the vehicle.

“It was her training that helped her react in that situation,” said detective Sgt. C.J. Harper of the Jersey Village Police Department.

On her off day, she was about to drive to Richmond to attend an in-service training class.

“The suspects had no way of knowing she was an officer,” said Jersey Village Police Chief Charles N. Wedemeyer.

When the men ordered her to move to the passenger seat, she grabbed her gun from her purse and fired several times, killing one man and striking another.

Police later found a third suspect hiding nearby in a getaway car.

Wedemeyer said police do not think the suspects fired their weapons.

The two surviving suspects were charged Wednesday with aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon.

Wedemeyer said investigators think the men may have been involved in other carjackings and robberies in the Houston area.

Cordale Stubblefield, 19, of Cypress, was killed in the shooting.

Christopher Wayne Yell, 19, of the 31600 block of Cypress Circle in Waller, was in critical condition at a local hospital. His bail was set at $200,000.

Yell had been sentenced to four years of probation in June for a residential burglary charge.

The third suspect, Marcus Marquis Holmes, 20, of the 16500 block of Cypress Thicket in Cypress, is being held in the Harris County Jail on $150,000 bail.

Investigators said Mong spent Wednesday with family and counselors away from her apartment.

“She was shaken up at the time, but I think she’s holding up pretty well, considering there was a life-and-death struggle in that car,” Wedemeyer said.

Mong declined repeated requests for interviews.

Her fiance, Shawn Horton, is an officer in Jersey Village.

“Many of us know her through her fiance,” Harper said. “She’s a very dedicated and conscientious individual.”

Richmond police would not comment on the incident other than to confirm that Mong is an officer there.

Shooting in a car ? Multiple shots ? That must have been REAL scary for eveyone involved . Something about mulitiple people with guns in a really small space scares the pee out of me and makes my eardrums hurt in sympathy .

Do you have to tell the Car Dealer when you kill someone in your car when your trading it in ?

A cop shot two-thirds of an attacker, and killed one full attacker? That’s pretty imnpressive.

Bad fag. You know what I meant.

I wish I lived in a country where you could touch - nay, beat, maim or kill! - your attackers without risking a court case for attacking a sweet defenceless criminal.

I wish we could revert back to the old school days, where police officers, correctional officers and military personnel could indiscriminately lay the smackdown on anyone who deserved a good asskicking.

Today’s dirtbags just know absolutely no respect.

You still can Phoenix.
http://www.youtube.com/w/Meet-Psycho-Cop?v=Cfs1vZ4tZjQ&search=cop%20beating

Well…despite all the internal inquiries and lawsuits the department’s gonna face for that little ‘incident’, that peckerwood got what was coming to him.

I wish we could revert back to the old school days, where police officers, correctional officers and military personnel could indiscriminately lay the smackdown on anyone who deserved a good asskicking.

SIEG HEIL!

Go smoke another doob, hippy. :XXsmoker:

LOL @ the Phoenix/ICY interaction. hilarious.

However, i’m somewhere in the middle of the road on this one. On one hand, i’m all for the Phoenix-style smackdown. But if ICY’s gonna go smoke another one, I’d be more likely to pitch in.

THen you should move to the Middle East. Apparently, they are still into that mideval shit over there, whereas ‘barbarism’ is considered a bit passe in places like Canada.

:bbd:

Props to this chick, though. Too bad she didn’t hit center mass on all three of these poor misguided youths.

That’s great advice coming from somebody who lives in the faggot capital of North America.

By the way, it’s spelled ‘medieval’, you illiterate moron.

Go smoke another doob, hippy.

Oooh! Touched a nerve, eh? Seriously, I agree, good idea, let’s throw out the constitution. The Bill of Rights was good enough, right? A little beating never hurt…er…killed anybody, right?

You have a phone book collection, don’t you Phoenix?

Since you mentioned it, yes, the Bill of Rights was good enough. It was good enough to deal with alot of these maggots who nowadays, commit crimes on innocent people, get off with a slap on the wrist, spend their sentence in club Fed, then go free to commit more crimes…at the expense of the Canadian taxpayer, like you (assuming you even pay taxes to begin with).

Don’t you get me fucking started on why I think that Charter of Rights and Freedoms is worth less than a warehouse full of government toilet paper. It protects the rights of criminals. Nothing more.

Phone book collection? Get bent, buddy.

Lets just modify the 4th ammendment and do away with the 8th. Hahahahahahahahahah…cough…cough. Hahahahahahahaha.

Phone book collection? Get bent, buddy.

I tawt I taw police bwutawity, I deed! I deed!

Don’t you get me fucking started on why I think that Charter of Rights and Freedoms is worth less than a warehouse full of government toilet paper. It protects the rights of criminals. Nothing more.

The bit about equality for everyone regardless of gender, race, religion, orientation…that’s all fluff, right? The important thing is, it protects criminals, damnit!

But you know damn well that there ISN’T equality for everyone, nor has there been for quite a long time now.

And I suppose that you don’t think that it’s a tad unfair to those people out there who decide to make an honest living, pay tribute and respect to this country and their laws by actually OBEYING the law and showing a bit of personal responsibility, when these rights are guaranteed for everyone…even, nay, ESPECIALLY those out there who show no responsibility at all and pay lip service to the laws. And the Charter too.

You know what the funny thing is, ICY? These same creeps who break the law are the FIRST to remind you of their rights when their asses are in a sling for infringing on anothers by making that person a victim of crime. They don’t give a shit about the Charter either, except when it’s convenient for them to do so.

But you know damn well that there ISN’T equality for everyone, nor has there been for quite a long time now.

Er…try never?

And I suppose that you don’t think that it’s a tad unfair to those people out there who decide to make an honest living, pay tribute and respect to this country and their laws by actually OBEYING the law and showing a bit of personal responsibility, when these rights are guaranteed for everyone…even, nay, ESPECIALLY those out there who show no responsibility at all and pay lip service to the laws. And the Charter too.

No, I just think it’s very hard to strip only those who deserve to be stripped of their rights. It has never worked that way, it can’t. When you do that, and this isn’t trolling, you are on the path to Fascism. You’re saying “I know better, I can make the right call all the time, and when I don’t, the sacrifice of a few innocents is worth the good of the whole”. No Phoenix, it’s not worth it.

You know what the funny thing is, ICY? These same creeps who break the law are the FIRST to remind you of their rights when their asses are in a sling for infringing on anothers by making that person a victim of crime. They don’t give a shit about the Charter either, except when it’s convenient for them to do so.

When I break the law, my first and only thought is avoiding the police. My Charter Rights do not enter the picture.

Why couldn’t it work that way? Everyone’s entitled to rights, but why do you think it’s such a bad idea that some responsibility should go with those rights? Sure, it’s a good thing that we live in a society that has more rights and freedoms than any other nation in the world. Many in the world who have less than we would call these ‘rights and freedoms’ we have priveleges. Perhaps they’re correct in a cynical way.

But being in the law enforcement field, and formerly the corrections field, I’ve seen these same rights and freedoms abused by people who take such advantage of their freedoms that it infringes on the freedom of others. I just feel that there needs to be a system of checks and balances so that these freedoms are protected. Everyone should be entitled to them, but if a person is going to commit violent crimes against society, they should lose some of these rights, but be given the opportunity to earn them back.

That way, there’s an incentive to rehabilitate.

Have you heard of the theory of Due Process? Conversely, it operates on similar principles as those you’ve just described. It states basically that 'it’s better to set 1000 guilty free than convict one innocent. But, this same process too, ‘sacrificed’ some innocents. Remember Guy Paul Morin? The guy who was wrongfully convicted of the sex killing of a young girl, but was years later exonerated due to DNA evidence which identified the killer. How about David Milgaard? Same deal. That man lost 23 years of his life that he’ll never get back due to this ‘due process’.

It would seem that both ideals have it’s flaws. But, from my standpoint, I’d rather get them all and eliminate any doubt, than give someone the benefit of the doubt when they clearly don’t deserve it, and see them go free on a technicality (which happens more often than you hear in the media).

How often have you been arrested?