[QUOTE=submessenger;2890983]Down here, CCW classes are one or two hours, tops. You can’t audit. You either take it, or you don’t. It’s (woefully) not a form of higher education, it’s a hole in your ticket that needs punched so you can legally carry.
Ongoing and/or tactical instruction is a whole different animal. I know that’s not what you’re talking about, but it’s worth saying. Those courses can last weeks or months, so dropping by for a sample class would be in the realm of possibility.
OP is on about failures in the basics, these one or two hour courses. As much as I hate the idea of gun control, having reasonable standards for basic instruction seems like a really good idea.
As far as military training, I remember we used to hear a couple of times a year about new NDs during watch turnovers. Thus, even the military doesn’t get it right when it comes to basics. Probably different in Marines/Army, but Navy, it was basically a one-day class during basic. Subsequent qualifications were not subjected to that same rigor, in my memory. This probably varied widely based on MOS/rate post-basic; a GM or MA would be expected to have regular arms training, others - not so much. I was lucky to get into a position where I qual’d on Mossberg and M16, and the safety parts of those trainings were taken as read.[/QUOTE]
I’ve hunted and been shooting with military (ex and active) that were excellent at firearms safety, handling, shooting. Others, not so much…
The basic courses are available via the NRA, or reputable private academies, depending on what one has to spend. Any skill is perishable. Taking on 2 hour course,then locking a .38 snubby in a drawer isn’t going to result in very good shooting or safety skills.
Of course, that’s an argument for requiring ongoing training and certification, which costs money and time. Not something less financially fortunate people have…