Thats RIGHT you want to discuss the bible and how it is historical do it here . You want to tell the fundies to wake the fuck up … do it here .
But general discussion on the Christian Religion now has its own HOME .
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?p=799045#post799045
this is a good place to start … continue … from here please …
And why isnt Sirc here … he has the Teh R3@l _tianity … that isnt 2 deadly 2 spar … He has continued to defend his faith ( even if he mistakingly depects it as fact ) . How come everyone else will just flame for a bit then take off when the debate turns hard for them ?
Where are the other Men of Faith on this board ?
Gnosticism for the Win. Booyah Bitch! Thread over.
Step off bitch! I have the Dead Sea Scrolls!
Fucking hell, man. I seriously don’t give a shit about Christianity BS- hell, all I know is Jewish shit. But someone telling me that you should ignore scientific evidence in favor of philosophy ticks me the fuck off.
Well this was disappointing …
No! SMASH the MONKEY!
OOOoo…three djimbe’s.
And I’m movin’ on UP… :
:
Its good to Be LEO with a sense of humor …
but I dont get the “smash the monkey” part of it …
its not that hard … and nothing really to be all that proud of …
Not that hard, eh?
actually (just to keep this thread alive) no one said that. certainly not me.
You see, “Science” works on the relevence of evidence to the particular topic (theory) at hand.
your slam on behaviorism had absolutely nothing to do with my point. That point being “you are a product of your environment” “Life experiences that effect you psychologically, can effect you on a physical level as well” leading up to the debate at hand, FREE_WILL: "what you like and dislike is motivated by factors outside your control (determinism). This was the issue at hand, and if you were as scientifically minded as you claim, your objection to me would be based on the truthfullness of THIS point. However, and by the way, is not doubted by, as you say “modern psychologists” and “hard scientists” that past experience regarding mental states influences the interpretation of current stimuli. modern psychologists, for example, understand that depression starts in the ‘mind’ (and yes, chemicals in the brain) and if left unchecked can bring on major physical responses in the body. Pavlov’s Dog experiment, is still indeed valid. Conditioning does still happen in people. Not sure where you’ve heard otherwise.
You also claimed “Modern science has debunked determinst thinking” and I would like a SHRED of evidence of this. Since you’re so keen on"hard science" this should be easy for you.
Frankly, I’m guessing you’re a head-strong college student, so desperate to “appear smart” that you ignored the entire debate at hand, to blow hot air about something you learned in class today.
oh, and dont cling too hard to the nut-sack of modern science, the one constant in the history of evidence based scientific thought, is the ability for it to prove itself utterly incorrect every few years.
PS: I fucked your mom.
The Borbons are the offspring of Christ. No it’s the Windsors. No the Borbons. ad nauseum.
Mmm, bourbon.
BOY, I SURE AM GLAD GOD PROVIDED ALL THESE MEDICINAL, TECHNOLOGICAL, ENGINEERING, SOCIAL AND ASTRONOMICAL ADVANCES. OTHERWISE WE’D ALL STILL BE LIVING IN CAVES AND STONING PEOPLE! :icon_salu :icon_salu :icon_salu
whats wrong with stoned people ?
the Rastafarians have Teh R3@l X-tianity … and access to the best Chi .
not when I am on Bullshido … though sometimes when I read your posts … I get hard … something about a man in uniform … and clown make up and the outfit just makes me purrrrr …
:hijackp: ( included the pic for p-p-p-p-p-p-poste …fuck it … future reference … )
Agreed. Their Chi is powerful indeed.