Best 9/11 Documentary: That will lead into a rant about everything under the sun.

I’ve watched alot of them, but this one is the most comprehensive that I’ve seen to date.

9/11 Coincidence Theory

There has finally been a small intrusion into the corporate controlled mainstream media with the buildingwhat.org advertisments and Geraldo Rivera’s coverage. I believe that this approach might be very effective since it is incomprehensible to the average american that their government could be this evil. Once it is proven and widely accepted that building 7 was a controlled demolition, then the fact that the twin towers were also destroyed in this way will be blatantly obvious and then the horrendous reality of our current situation may begin to break through the denial of the US citizens’ awareness.

[quote=Animosimony;2472304]I’ve watched alot of them, but this one is the most comprehensive that I’ve seen to date.

9/11 Coincidence Theory

There has finally been a small intrusion into the corporate controlled mainstream media with the buildingwhat.org advertisments and Geraldo Rivera’s coverage. I believe that this approach might be very effective since it is incomprehensible to the average american that their government could be this evil. Once it is proven and widely accepted that building 7 was a controlled demolition, then the fact that the twin towers were also destroyed in this way will be blatantly obvious and then the horrendous reality of our current situation may begin to break through the denial of the US citizens’ awareness.[/quote]

Oh good god. You’re going to make me watch this piece of crap just so I can tell you how wrong you are, aren’t you?

But for now, I’ll deal with two things: intelligence failure and prior knowledge. How many intelligence agents have you dealt with? My guess is none, but it’s a thankless job, even when you ‘win’ you can’t usually tell people about it, except in the most general terms. These are not people who do what they do for political or monetary reasons, they do it because of two things: first, their ego. They like knowing secrets. More importantly, they do it because they’re trying to keep things they value safe, like their friends, family and ideals. They are not generally the type of people who would sell these things out because one of their bosses said to leave it alone. Sure, there are a few but I find it extremely improbable that there would be enough to really keep this in the dark. There’d be agents coming out of the woodwork to point fingers at this. There aren’t. Why is that? Because they fucked up. The CIA, even though it is a monolithic organization with a great deal of funding cannot know everything, but I’ll get back to that.

On the issue of prior knowledge: did we have prior knowledge of the September 11th attacks? Sort of. There were rumblings on the SIPRNET (classified internet) of possible attacks involving planes flown into buildings and Al Qaeda wanting to attack on US soil. I remember my thoughts and feelings as I watched things unfold on BBC. I was horrified as saw the twin towers standing, one with a huge smoking hole in the side and said aloud, “Oh my fucking god… it’s supposed to be a multi-pronged attack.”

How can I speak to these things? Because at the time I was part of US Army intelligence, stationed in Germany. Part of my job was to compile a weekly briefing for the area commanders with a quick and dirty assessment of what was going on from a human intelligence (HUMINT) standpoint, so I read a lot of intelligence reports during that time. I’ve also dealt with CIA agents on a couple of occasions and a great deal of my training was in counterintelligence, part of which is essentially “How do you spot a spy? Well… here’s how you make one.”

I promised I’d get back to the CIA’s lack of omniscience. Since before the fall of the Soviet Union the US Intelligence community has had a major problem. Spending on HUMINT has dropped year after year in favor of Signals and Imagery Intelligence, what HUMINT resources we have were geared toward dealing with a nation as a threat, namely the Soviet Union and it’s satellites. Counterterrorism against a non-state funded terrorist threat is simply not something most high ranking human intelligence agents were equipped to deal with and that filters down to lower levels. To further complicate things, at the time there were virtually no white guys in terrorist organizations. The truly frightening thing here is that those spending trends continue. While I don’t have anything against more drones and better satellites more attention needs to be given to those who have boots on the ground and sources to work in order to get a handle on this.

Buildingwhat.org is a load of bullshit. No, explosives did not bring down either Building 7 or the primary towers.

This video is a long and verbose Youtube montage with politicians and media hounds and People In High Places Demanding The Truth and droning on about wanting to re-examine what legions of engineers already figured out and told the government.

The NIST report on WTC 7 came back already …it was fire. I saw this in Popular Mechanics, no less, a magazine where they know something about architecture:
[URL=“http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/4278874”]
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest

…Here’s a whole goddamn issue devoted to debunking 9/11 theories.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842?page=5#wtc7

There is a NIST report on the 9/11 towers and why they fell.

No it has not been debunked by anyone of importance (Internet blogs do not count no matter how many say they have “debunked” the NIST report).

It has been simulated in depth at Purdue University

Purdue researchers have developed a scientifically based video animation of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Their research has found that it was the weight of the fuel combined with the fire, and not the aircraft itself, that caused the most damage to the buildings. This information can be used by engineers to build new structures that are better able to withstand such attacks, the researchers say. (Purdue University image/Voicu Popescu)
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/images/+2007/popescu-animation2.jpg
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/images/+2007/popescu-animation3.jpg

[quote=wetware;2472323]a great deal of my training was in counterintelligence, part of which is essentially “How do you spot a spy? Well… here’s how you make one.”
[/quote]

I realized I should clarify this point. In order to make someone turn their back on their values and ethics you must work on character flaws. Simple greed usually will not suffice. Take Aldrich Ames. He got money, yes. More important in his recruitment was the fact that he had been passed over for promotion several times. Once he had committed one act of espionage blackmail and the thrill was enough to keep him in business. What you’re suggesting would require that an ENTIRE ORGANIZATION be recruited in similar fashion with no one in their counterintelligence section noticing.

I appreciate your interest in responding to my initial post, but please watch the video first.

At 1:20:15 -

“In July, 2001, FBI counterterrorism expert John O’Neill says, ‘The main obstacles to investigate Islamic Terrorism were US oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it.’ He adds, ‘All the answers, everything needed to dismantle Osama Bin Laden’s organization can be found in Saudi Arabia.’ On August 22, 2001, John O’Neill resigned from the FBI because of repeated obstruction of his investigation into Al Queda. (New Yorker. 1/14/2002) On August 23, 2001, he began his new job as head of security for the World Trade Center and was killed in the 9/11 attacks.”

It is a well known fact that Al Queda was originally utilized by the CIA and ISI. The myth proposed by the official explanation is that at some point during the recent years before 9/11, they “turned” against the USA.

The buildingwhat movement includes 1300 architects and engineers that state unequivocally that the official explanation for the destruction of building 7 is complete bullshit (no that wasn’t a type o, one thousand three hundred architects and engineers).

No steel framed building in history has ever collapsed due to fires until it supposedly happened on 9/11/01. Steel framed skyscrapers have been completely gutted by fires but the the steel frame remains intact. Even if it were possible for them to collapse, do you really think it would look exactly like a controlled demolition? The 3 towers collapsed at almost free-fall speed directly into their own footprint with an obliteration of most of the concrete into pyroclastic dust clouds. The NIST report is as much of a bullshit whitewash story as the original 911 comission “investigation”.

All of these events occurred to profit the oil companies and the military industrial complex, and in the process laws were signed into effect (in the name of fighting the supposed war on terror) that have infringed on our constitutional rights so that we can be more easily controlled when it is deemed necessary.

And of course, if war now erupts in Korea, the US will have to be involved . . .

The only thing the US exports now is jobs and war. As soon as the conflict in Korea was anounced, the value of the dollar went up. The middle class is moving towards extinction. Some of the richest people in the world are pulling the strings and accomplishing their goals. To them, you and I are completely expendable. We need to wake up now before it is too late.

Yeah, yeah, I know. To many of you I’m just one of those nut-job conspiracy theorists. I guess we’ll find out in the not-too-distant future and you had better pray to God that you’re right . . .

Pretty sneaky sis. I do enjoy how building 7 coming down is always interspersed with The towers. You could be right about BUILDING 7. I like how no one goes to see if it was an attack. No one wants to see if it was anything else. OMG da gubment did it.

Anyway The Two Towers.

We have jet fuel, not electrical or arson fire. We have two planes slamming into two buildings, but that doesn’t factor into any of these arguments. Like you, the video and other conspiracy theorists always move away from the impact of the planes.

Now, how many Steel frame skyscrapers have been hit by planes? No, no, no. You are trying to convince people that this is a “whitewash.” So, instead of separating the variables explain each as it interacts with the other.

The “myth” you speak of is actually documented fact, since at one time OBL and the mujahideen were fighting the Soviets with US weapons and training, and fast forward two decades and OBL and Al Qaeda are attacking American cities. Where is this “myth” you speak of?

1300 architects and engineers who were not part of the group of architects and engineers at NIST who had actual, physical access to evidence and location.

1300 architects and engineers who signed up at ae911truth.org (which receives 5% of the donations from buildingwhat.org)

1300 architects and engineers who support two sites (ae911truth.org and buildingwhat.org) which conveniently fail to mention that there was even a WTC Building 7 NIST report issued in 2008. Why don’t they mention there has ALREADY been a NIST examination, instead of suggesting that the whole thing was fabricated.

Really, so every single engineer at NIST is now part of some conspiracy. So are the researchers at Purdue who have been able to simulate and prove EXACTLY how the primary towers fell?

Neither the NIST reports nor the 9/11 commission’s findings have been directly challenged by evidence or by any real organization. Just a lot of conjecture and theories, based largely on Internet campaigns.

Jets hit skyscrapers…burning jet fuel gets pulled downward through the core of each building, causing so much structural damage that the building implodes under its own weight. Yep it looks like controlled demolition. It’s not.

[quote=Animosimony;2472417]
And of course, if war now erupts in Korea, the US will have to be involved . . .[/quote]

War erupted in Korea 50 years ago and never ceased. A day without shelling in Korea is like a morning without my bagel and coffee.

I would love a study on conspiracy belief and the rise when the economy is bad.

A picture of a woman standing in the hole left by one of the planes:

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://investigate911.org/Woman-in-WTC-Tower-hole-made-by-jet-is-not-filled-with-fire-or-hot.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php%3Fpid%3D465811&usg=__z6SoNPwOPUK-rnDbYOO_JM9OpmQ=&h=829&w=555&sz=63&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&tbnid=R2Ypjb8p27oLeM:&tbnh=144&tbnw=96&prev=/images%3Fq%3D911%2Bwoman%2Bin%2Bhole%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1

There is a recording of one of the firefighters responding on his radio after he went up into one of the towers. He states that there were two relatively small areas on fire and two lines (hoses) should be able to take care of it.

If you want to continue responding by regurgitating the propaganda that you have been fed, that’s fine, but I would ask, once again, that you at least watch the video first and look at the alternative explanations.

The falacies of the NIST investigation are dealt with beginning at 31:20.

The myth I was referring to is the propaganda that Al Queda turned on their handlers in the US. There is evidence of their involvement with the CIA up until the date of the attack. WATCH THE VIDEO

[quote=Animosimony;2472450]
The myth I was referring to is the propaganda that Al Queda turned on their handlers in the US. There is evidence of their involvement with the CIA up until the date of the attack. WATCH THE VIDEO[/quote]
Yep like the
1993 attack on U.S. troops in.
1998 US embassy bombings.
2000 Bombing of the USS Cole.
oh wait no, no those sounds like attacks against America to me.

In psychology conspiracy theories have been studied quite a bit and there’s a bunch of interesting stuff about them. They’re essentially an attempt to explain what we lack the ability to parse rationally and operate within the same mental framework that provided us with such wonders as Zeus, Kokopelli and Raiden. We couldn’t explain the weather and couldn’t effect the weather, so a god must have been involved. The same would likely happen with economic woes since most Americans lack a meaningful understanding of economics and conspiracies never seem to crop up when something beneficial happens.

[quote=Animosimony;2472450]A picture of a woman standing in the hole left by one of the planes:
[/quote]

Yeah thanks for the graphic imagery. A co-worker/friend of mine named Christoffer Carstanjen was on UA 175 when it was flown into the south tower on his way to a motorcycle club meet to ride up the Big Sur. Thanks for reminding me.

10,000 gallons of jet fuel (likely KEROSENE) and two little fires. You’re nuts.
http://wtc.nist.gov/

This video is from 2007 and NIST released their WTC 7 final report in 2008.

Your information has been oudated and debunked, in a major engineering periodical.

[quote=Animosimony;2472450]
The myth I was referring to is the propaganda that Al Queda turned on their handlers in the US. There is evidence of their involvement with the CIA up until the date of the attack. WATCH THE VIDEO[/quote]

No shit. The CIA trained and armed them (the CIA has trained and armed a lot of insurgencies), but the CIA also routinely fucks up operations and their assets turn on them. I can only imagine OBL’s sick pleasure at pulling one over on the CIA, getting a sword strike into the “paper tiger” he thought of the US as.

Ultimately you have to wonder what motivation the US government would have to make up a lie, vs. what OBL himself has said about his own motivations to attack the towers.

Instead of chasing shadows, people like you should be listening to the enemy’s words because his motivations are clear:

“America is a great power possessed of tremendous military might and a wide-ranging economy, but all this is built on an unstable foundation which can be targeted, with special attention to its obvious weak spots. If America is hit in one hundredth of these weak spots, God willing, it will stumble, wither away and relinquish world leadership.”

In the 18-minute tape, bin Laden, who appeared to be sitting or standing at a table against a neutral background, said: “Despite entering the fourth year after Sept. 11, Bush is still deceiving you and hiding the truth from you and therefore the reasons are still there to repeat what happened.” Bin Laden said he thought of the method of attacking U.S. skyscrapers when he saw Israeli aircraft bombing tower blocks in Lebanon in 1982. “We decided to destroy towers in America,” he said. “God knows that it had not occurred to our mind to attack the towers, but after our patience ran out and we saw the injustice and inflexibility of the American-Israeli alliance toward our people in Palestine and Lebanon, this came to my mind.”
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_10-29-04.html

[quote=W. Rabbit;2472505]
No shit. The CIA trained and armed them (the CIA has trained and armed a lot of insurgencies), but the CIA also routinely fucks up operations and their assets turn on them. [URL=“http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_10-29-04.html”][/quote]
Not really the case here. Assets are developed and used its not necessarily a life time sort of relationship. The soviets pulled out of Afghanistan thus the end of their relationship with the mujahideen. Some elements of the mujahideen rallied around Bin Laden and formed al-Qaeda. In part the reasons that the US was on al-Qaeda radar was the Prince Sultan Air Base.

But assets are developed, armed, used, and often (in the case of the CIA) left on their own to find new causes, in this case, OBL found holy war and a lot of armed, willing fighters nearby.

Since then he’s spread his network of willing fighters even further to the point where the US is being mailed bombs from places like Yemen.

But the US government, which can’t contain leaks about ANYTHING, hasn’t had a single official “leak” of a 9/11 conspiracy, or any evidence thereof. Just a lot of Internet bullshit vs. engineers AND university scientists, some of whom lost friends/family/co-workers on 9/11.

Yeah the American people are all in on it. :wink:

Bill Maher sums up what I would say:

YouTube - Bill Maher on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

[quote=Hiro Protagonist;2472515]Bill Maher sums up what I would say:

YouTube - Bill Maher on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories[/quote]

pushups, and I have a crush on you otherwise…

[quote=W. Rabbit;2472512]
But the US government, which can’t contain leaks about ANYTHING[/quote]
This isn’t exactly true either there are plenty of classified-top secret documents that with out clearance your simply not going to get your hands on. Plenty of intelligence operations and paramilitary operations that you will never hear about.
Saying that I certainly don’t believe a “false flag” operation could be carried out on the scale of 9/11 with out some sort of leak and its absurd to think that 9/11 was an inside job.

Now that being said, I am cynical enough that I wouldn’t be surprise if some intelligence reports may have been over looked by certain parties that did benefit heavily from the attacks.

[quote=goodlun;2472523]This isn’t exactly true either there are plenty of classified-top secret documents that with out clearance your simply not going to get your hands on. Plenty of intelligence operations and paramilitary operations that you will never hear about.
.[/quote]

Someone will hear about them, and eventually the public will know, even if it takes 50 years. That’s how long its taken for post-WWII intelligence operations to become public, in the last decade all sorts of CIA “secrets” about Vietnam and the 80s have come out too. At the end of the day the CIA’s track record with keeping secrets is not what I would call pristine. I respect the CIA as a whole, but a lot of their dirtiest laundry is on public display. Maybe that is a hallmark of a good democracy…

I have two great books: “The Secret History of the CIA” and “Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA”, both written by well established authors with access to the agency.

There are FOIA requests, declassified reports, and insider tales coming out every day… “and ye shall know the Truth…” :slight_smile:

The problem with the theorists is that there must always be a certain demographic of people who won’t accept the “official” story on any level.

Everyone needs a hobby.

Since no one who has posted yet is watching the video and responding to the evidence presented in it, I’m done with this. But I will leave you with a few more things to consider:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/falseflag

False Flag Terrorism

“False flag terrorism” occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy’s flag was hung instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, it was called a “false flag” attack.

There are many examples of false flag attacks throughout history. For example, it is widely known that the Nazis, in Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set fire to their own parliament, the Reichstag, and blamed that fire on others. The Reichstag fire was the watershed event which justified Hitler’s seizure of power and suspension of liberties.

And in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel’s Defense Minister was brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government. Click here for verification.

The Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power (see also this essay and this report). And the Turkish government has been caught bombing its own and blaming it on a rebel group to justify a crackdown on that group. Muslim governments also play this game. For example, the well-respected former Indonesian president claimed that their government had a role in the Bali bombings.

This sounds nuts, right? You’ve never heard of this “false flag terrorism,” where a government attacks its own people then blames others in order to justify its goals, right? And you are skeptical of the statements discussed above? Please take a look at these historical quotes:

“If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” - U.S. President James Madison

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” - Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

What about the U.S.?

Is it logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so? Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950’s posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see also this essay).

And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO carried out terror bombings in Italy with the help of the Pentagon and CIA and blamed communists in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Moreover, declassified U.S. Government documents show that in the 1960s, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan code-named Operation Northwoods to blow up American airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. The operation was not carried out only because the Kennedy administration refused to implement these Pentagon plans.

For lots more on the astonishing Operation Northwoods, see the ABC news report; the official declassified documents; and watch this interview with James Bamford, the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. One quote from the Northwoods documents states: “A ‘Remember the Maine’ incident could be arranged: We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”

What about Al-Qaeda?

You might think Al-Qaeda is different. It is very powerful, organized, and out to get us, right? Consider this Los Angeles Times article, reviewing a BBC documentary entitled The Power of Nightmares, which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype). And former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski testified to the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative.”

And did you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but had – at the last minute – cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator’s strong wishes? See also this TV news report.

Have you heard that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11? Did you know that years after 9/11 the FBI first stated that it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11? (See also this partial confirmation by the Washington Post) And did you see the statement in Newsweek by the CIA commander in charge of the capture that the U.S. let Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan?

Have you heard that the anthrax attacks – which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists – used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test “gone wrong.” For more on this, see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer and this statement by a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (and this one).

It is also interesting that the only Congress members mailed anthrax letters were key Democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing PATRIOT Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of Congress into passing that act without even reading it. And though it may be a coincidence, White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.

Even General William Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, said “By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism, yet in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation” (the audio is here).

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following highly respected people are saying:

Former prominent Republican U.S. Congressman and CIA official Bob Barr stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that elements in government are using fear to try to bring this about.

Republican U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that the government “is determined to have martial law.” He also said a contrived “Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.” Former National Security Adviser Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify yet another war.

The former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, Paul Craig Roberts, who is called the “Father of Reaganomics” and is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek, and Scripps Howard News Service, has said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging ‘terrorist’ attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?

Retired 27-year CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

“We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation – big violent explosions of some kind – we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want.”

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to “play fast and loose” with terror alerts and warnings and even terrorist events in order to rally people behind the flag.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States “the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.” Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction. He is now saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government. And British Parliament Member George Galloway stated that “there is a very real danger” that the American government will stage a false flag terror attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.

The abundance of reliable information in this essay suggests that not only has the U.S. in the past conducted false flag operations, but there is a possibility that 9/11 involved some element of this deceit, and a future false flag operation cannot be ruled out. Let us spread this news to all who care so that we might build the critical mass necessary to stop these secret operations and work together for a more caring civil society.

Special Note: For a collection of reliable, verifiable information suggesting that 9/11 may have been a form of false flag operation, please see the 9/11 Information Center available at this link.

What you can do:
Inform your media and political representatives of this vital information on false flag operations. To contact those close to you, click here. Urge them also to join in calling for the release of secret documents related to such operations and for a new, impartial investigation of 9/11.
Learn more about 9/11 and the secret societies which may have been involved in this powerful lesson from the free Insight Course.
Read concise summaries of revealing major media reports available here suggesting elements of government either allowed or facilitated the 9/11 attacks.
Read other powerful, reliable articles dealing with the 9/11 at this link.
Spread this news to your friends and colleagues, and recommend this article on key news websites so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.

                      ***end of article***

What people believe about 9/11 can be broken down into 4 categories.

  1. The official explanation about the terrorists and the US reacting to defend us from them.
  2. Same as #1 except that the incident was also used as an excuse to start wars for monetary and strategic purposes in addition to the “war on terror”
  3. Certain members of the government knew about the impending attacks but did nothing to prevent it because of vested interests in utilizing the event for their purposes
  4. Members of the government having direct involvement in the planning and facilitation of the attacks

At first almost everyone fell under #1
Now almost everyone at the very least believes #2
More and more people are moving to #3 every day
More and more people are moving to #4, although they are still a minority (it is hard for most people to initially accept that something this horrific could be going on within the US government)

Unfortunately, the majority of the real evidence points to #4 being the actual scenario.

As I understand it anything that does not contain information that is still sensitive becomes declassified after 25 years. However something becoming declassified isn’t a “leak”. A leak is information that is suppose to still be secret getting out.