Why is this thread not in Trollshido?
Because people need a clean example of how NOT to start an investigation and what happens when they start threads like this in MABS.
Oh JASON!!! You CAD!!!
Because people need a clean example of how NOT to start an investigation and what happens when they start threads like this in MABS.
That is the most ridiculous moderation strategy I have ever encountered.
We tried it the other way after Phrost made a decision to better enforce moderation policy in this sub-forum. We were kicking practically everything. That was even more ridiculous than me allowing this tangent of yours to continue. (I fully expect another moderator to remove it.)
It’s simple: If you want to bash someone with words you are personally liable for, do it in YMAS. If it’s in MABS, incorrect claims which seemingly have some proper basis will be refuted in the same fashion correct claims will be supported.
In fact, this entire sub-forum is ridiculous, but I always preferred to just edit stupid posts like that.
Culled from:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?t=54324
Aw man! Did you have to post another one? I was hoping to leave something for Wolf to do.
As always, any posts anyone makes means they are personally liable for their statements. Why would any moderator edit any post when it is ultimately far funnier in the grand scheme of things to leave it that way?
I was always willing to take liability for editing, posting, and threatening ass rape.
Yes. And, normally I’d give someone kudos for that, but you’re an idiot. So, your willingness to shoulder the liability for what others say doesn’t count. Plus, you have already shown you are not a man of your word.
HEAD, TOILET, NOW!
Still, I will begrudgingly acknowledge your feigned willingness to shoulder this just for the sake of you wanting to be a douche when there are so many other ways to fuck with people’s heads is pretty funny in itself.
Me not being a man of my word has nothing to do with liability. Liability is assumed as soon as action is taken. Being an idiot also has very little to do with liability, unless you’re arguing that I lack the mental capacity to enter into legally binding agreements.
Well, do you have the capacity?
Do you think I have an IQ below, say 70?
Well, do you?
I’m a proven liar, so what I have to say on the matter is of little consequence, but I think the evidence speaks for itself.
But, you’re a proven liar! How are we supposed to believe you when you say this?
That’s the best part, you don’t have to believe ANYTHING I say. You only have to consider that my ability to string together coherent sentences precludes mental incompetence before the law.
Actually, mental incompetence before the law is not at all a question of whether a person is coherent. It has to do with whether a person understands the consequences of their actions and can assist in their own defense.
A computer program controlled by a trained monkey has the ability to string coherent sentences together.
And, in lieu of the fact of what you are, the evidence does speak for itself.